Sunday, January 24, 2021

Narrative Warfare: Blonde and the Black Pigeon Speaks

Blonde in the Belly of the Beast cut a podcast episode a few days ago with Black Pigeon Speaks (aka Felix Rex) prognosticatic the near future.

Given what's now going down, this is timely.

Monday, January 18, 2021

Narrative Warfare: Project Veritas Exposing Twitter's Leadership Again

Project Veritas continues to expose Twitter and their totalitarian paradigm of censorship.

They intend to take this regime global, so you're not going to escape this by being outside the United States.

You're not going to escape this by dodging the issue. This is a major media player that shapes cultural and political narratives; they have a vested interest in actively editing what goes out to users, and that doesn't stop with Trump.

That includes everything contrary to the Death Cult, to Empire. That means you.

You will not be allowed to sit on the sidelines and be neutral. They will force your defiance or your compliance- they will force you to choose. Don't bother waiting; make your choice and then build on it from there. Empire falls.

Saturday, January 16, 2021

Narrative Warfare: Blonde Talks With Legalman On The Culture

Blonde in the Belly of the Beast posted a second video this week, this time a one-hour interview with Legalman talking about Conservatism (and why it fails), the culture (and why the shitlibs dominate), and the follow-ons from that.

Most of this is ground that you're familiar with, but coming from someone in the legal system as a lawyer gives recognition that there is no voiting our way out and there is not likely to be any litigating either; the enemy controls the counting and the courts, so they can--and do--say "Fuck you" to your efforts to use the system get remedies and make them stick. (Yes, "stick", as in actually enforced and carried out.)

Thursday, January 14, 2021

Narrative Warfare: Blonde Talks w/ Computing Forever On What Comes Next

Blonde in the Belly of the Beast returns from maternity leave (Congratulations!) with an interview. She talks with Dave Cullen of Computing Forever regarding the deletion of his channel on YouTube and what comes next. Pay attention, because this is going to become a far more common story as Big Tech enacts Big Brother.

Wednesday, January 13, 2021

Narrative Warfare: It Glows In The Dark

Seen this making the rounds. Thankfully plenty of folks called this out for being fake and gay, as it came from an Antifa agent.

There is only one response necessary.

Of course you're not going. You're not stupid. This is the same gay op the Thralls use in their Narrative Warfare schemes: gin up their opposition, bring them to an event, then wreck it with cameras waiting to make the opposition look bad and justify further legal and corporate fuckery.

They, on the other hand, need optics. If they didn't constantly run these gay ops then they couldn't maintain their cover.

Now, however, they think they've won so the masks are coming off and these gay ops will transition to full on Humiliation Rituals. It will cease to be about the optics and go all-in on the flex of smearing shit in the opposition's face: "We can do this to you AT ANY TIME, and make you fall for it EVERY TIME, and there is NOTHING you can do about it. HAHAHA! Fuck you and die."

And they need that despair. Without it, they can't attain the total victory that they require to actually relief their amygdala and step down from mental breakdown. They must have our despair to feel anyting other than panic. This is why we never give up, even when it's all gone wrong, and force the hard-out at the worst. They become the architects of their own destruction due to their paranoia consuming themselves merely by seeing us in their shadows.

So don't go to the gay Glowie op. Stay in the shadows. Make their anxiety your ally. Empire falls.

Tuesday, January 12, 2021

Why Too Many Rulers Are Idiots

Rules are necessary. Most rulers are bad at making them and just as bad at enforcing them. I will explain below.

The key about rules is this maxim: Rules that are not enforced do not exist. They have no substance of their own, unlike both the ruler and the subject. They are like the weapons seen in animated works where characters pull them from nowhere when the plot demands; they exist when useful, and do not when they don't.

This means that a rule's substance is dependent upon an enforcer. Predators instinctively understand this, which is why they give no fucks about rules unless and until there is someone or something right there to enforce the rules.

The problem is that most rulers issue rules without regard to their enforcement. They give no consideration as to how to guarantee compliance, but rather presuppose compliance and assume that it is an aberration to not comply. This is so whether the ruler presumes that Man is Perfectable or not, whether Man is inherently Good or Evil, etc. and betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of how the machinry of governance actually works.

Yes, governance is a machine and rulership is the operation of that machine. Understand this and everything else gets easier to comprehend this.

The ruler cannot enforce any rule on his own any further than his person can reach. He requires either loyal subordinates or reliable tools to extend his reach. The ruler cannot enforce any rule that he lacks the will to enforce. The ruler cannot enforce any rule that he lacks the means to enforce. Successful dissidents break either the will or the means of enforcement.

Enforcers require that the ruler perform acts from time to time to secure and maintain their loyalty. This means giving them preferential treatment vs. the subjects, creating a distinct class division; Ruler/Subject becomes Ruler/Enforcer/Subject. If this tension is not managed properly, including by suppressing enforcer class awareness vs. the ruler, then ambitious enforcers will set up a weak ruler and make a puppet of him. (This already happened in much of the West; we call them "The Professional Managerial Class".)

Tools require comprehension of the technology, maintenance, and refinment. They also must be outright replaced from time to time. This is because the subjects of the tools, being disinclined to acquiese, will find ways to subvert or circumvent the tools; this puts a lifetime limit on the tools' effectiveness, a limit that exists because continued exposure is continued opportunity to observe operation and deduce function, from which countermeasures can be developed. Too rapid a pace of change can overwhelm the ruler's logistical capacity, resulting in the tools' nullification and the loss of the ruler's power.

While the above two points are often discussed, too often another is shunted aside: knowing what rules to make, or how to make them.

The problem is that rulers seek to control what is impractical to control, and of what is practical to control they choose impractical methods or means to do so. When the failures are investigated, the failure always begins with a false presupposition of what a ruler's objective; a false paradigm of operation results in incompetent operation every single time.

Most idiot rulers see themselves as separate and apart from those they rule, to whom they owe nothing and from whom all is owed. They also see compliance as the presumed state of existence, and non-compliance as the aberrant state. Their rule-making and rule-enforcement stems from these false presuppositions.

One who is separate and apart from you is an outsider, and no man owes anything to outsiders just as nothing is owed to you by outsiders. A true ruler is an insider, one of your nation--ideally one of your family, of your very bloodline--and therefore is a relation to you. You owe, and are owed in turn, loyalty to your kin. Competent rulers always ensure that the subjects see the ruler as One Of Them, as one of the In-Group.

Compliance is not the normal state. Governance, being nothing more than the upscaling of the family dynamic, operates on the same dynamic as a father to his children; every father knows that his children are unruly and must gain compliance to effectively govern them. Competent rulers understand that non-compliance is the norm, and therefore craft their governance as one successfully raises children.

(Side note: This is why there was, for a long time, a taboo against putting childless men into leadership positions.)

As we see, most rulers fail to consider any of these. This is because most rulers are too stupid, too narcisstic, or too weak to comprehend how to rule properly and therefore to rule competently- and why we long celebrated the counterexamples that came to become bywords for competent governance.

You can see this in the rules they make, and the way they go about enforcing those rules. It is no surprise that contempt for the rules, and the order they bring when used properly, rises under such mismanagement- along with contempt for the ruler and his enforcers. It happened during Prohibition, and it will happen now. The present rulers, across the West, are incompetently trained and their indoctrination makes it nigh-impossible to course-correct when their incompetence inevitably bites them in the ass. Make of that what you will, and pray you don't get a bloody-minded usurper willing and able to do his own wet-work when these technocrats' failure is complete.

Monday, January 11, 2021

Narrative Warfare: "Repressive Tolerance" Is How Empire Operates

Alexander Macris wrote this excellent essay the other day at Substack. The most important part is below.

If you’re reading this, you’re probably right-of-center. But perhaps you feel safe from repressive tolerance because your view are so, well, gosh-darn tolerable. You obviously don’t advocate right-wing violence. You’re not a racist or misogynist or homophobe or bigot. You just want America to have a healthy free market, a strong military, fair trade, low taxes, equality of opportunity, and protection of every citizen’s constitutional rights. You’re just a mainstream, moderate, right-of-center conservative!

Do not fool yourself into believing that because you are a moderate, you are safe from the doctrine of repressive tolerance. Herbert Marcuse explains that the plan is:

withdrawal of tolerance from regressive movements before they can become active; intolerance even toward thought, opinion, and word, and finally, intolerance… toward the self-styled conservatives [Tactics] would include the withdrawal of toleration of speech and assembly from groups and movements which promote aggressive policies, armament, chauvinism, discrimination on the grounds of race and religion, or which oppose the extension of public services, social security, medical care, etc.

Anyone who opposes any extension of public service, social security, or medical care, or who supports freedom of religion, is to be completely and utterly deplatformed. No freedom of speech, no freedom of assembly, no communication in word, print, or image.

This is the plan; this has always been the plan; all that has been lacking were the means to effectuate the plan. Those means are now at hand. If the President of the United States can be silenced, anyone can be.

And what happens if conservatives resist having their voices suppressed and repressed? Well that’s a problem that requires a solution. And as Herbert Marcuse explains:

[The solution] may require apparently undemocratic means…

I will leave it to the reader to ponder what sort of “undemocratic means” might be justified to solve the problem of conservative thought, opinion, word, action, or being.

The paradigm of Repressive Tolerance explains why Empire and its Thralls act in so hypocritical a manner. They believe that their enemies are existential threats that must be slaughtered if they cannot be subjugated. As they see no reason to co-exist with existential threats, they see no problem in treating those threats as things or animals and not as people; it's pure In-Group/Out-Group psychology wearing the trappings of political and moral philosophy. Carl Schmidt--someone they avowedly hate--would be proud.

That's what Repressive Tolerance is: a scheme for sifting Friend from Enemy, and then punishing the Enemy until said Enemy ceases to be an Enemy.

Now that we see the masks flying off, we see this quote playing out at the speed of Id.

Listen to the justifications. It's always about an Existential Threat narrative, and the justification is all about nullifying that threat as best they can. This also extends to all of the doxxing of those that attended the D.C. rally, including those ratted out by their own children (as per the 1984 quote, which the rats see no problem with) and friends. The pressure tactics against employers have returned, with predictable results.

Remember those Wu Flu lockdowns killing off small businesses across the economy? This plays into the Repressive Tolerance paradigm. The businesses most likely to pick up those fired for their politics are small businesses, and not Big Corporate; kill them off until, at most, a handful remain that the Thralls can control and now those disemployments can not only stick, but actually do the intended damage and have the intended effect.

Cutting off access to infrastructure is the same idea. Wrongthink? No banking for you; no banking means no medicine, no housing, no food, etc.- especially after all phyiscal currency is removed and only digital payments are accepted. (This, by the way, is why you must resist all attempts as going cashless at all levels.) The lockdowns are a dry run.

I will note that this has happened to every country that, formally or otherwise, had a commitment to Freedom of Speech and diavowed Blasphemy as an offense- in other words, to a country that abandoned Christianity due to the Enlightenment. "Repressive Tolerance" is nothing more than an inversion of the praxis of Christianity, making it Satanic. This is Empire, and it is by the sin identified by the Supreme Dark Lord Vox Day that it begins to worm its way to what we see now.

This is why they begged for freedom of speech in the first place. To put themselves in a position where they could deny it to everyone else. They demanded the toleration of evil so that they could eventually refuse to tolerate good. The Sin of Jeroboam leads invariably to the destruction of the nation that is foolish enough to commit it.

Empire must fall.