Sunday, June 25, 2017

Behold the Power of Not Caring: Sargon, Sark the Shark, & VidCon 2017

File this under "It Cain't Rain All The Time".

VidCon just wrapped up. Lots of folks I follow on YouTube and Twitter attended. One of them is Sargon of Akkad. He, and a lot of others who are major shitlords (Shadilay, my dudes and dudettes!) decided to attend a panel wherein SocJus conjob Anita Sarkeesian sat on the panel. They sat in the front of the mostly-empty hall, played nice, and nothing was going to happen until Anita recognized Sargon and decided to call him a "garbage human" to his face.

If you know SJWs, you know the Three Laws: They Lie, They Double-Down, and They Project. If you know the laws, then you know how they operate: weaponized shaming, meant to attack the target's status and use his empathy against him. If you know how they operate, then you know how the shaming attacks start: using any violation of The Narrative as pretext to initiate a Point & Shriek cry that cues the cult to Swarm and Shame.

Sargon knows this. Sargon's fellow shitlords know this. Sargon might as well have said "You just activiated my Trap Card!", because he (and his pals) immediately turned this around. Using Saul Alinsky's own rules against them, Sargon and company held Anita (and VidCon) up to their own professed standards prohibiting harassment.

This was a no-lose situation for Sargon. Either he gets VidCon (a SJW-amenable, if not converged, organization) to enforce their own rules against someone who's pushed this poison, or he exposes VidCon as a corrupt and dishonest organization that plays favorites and uses their rules as weapons to do so- and, therefore, no one should give them time or money ever again. (This, in turn, pries open an opportunity for an Alt-VidCon to rise up in parallel, surpass, and replace VidCon.)

The best part? Even if he's banned for life and no one heeds his exposure of the convention, he still wins! Why? VidCon needs him; Sargon in no way needs VidCon. (Especially if larger players like PewDiePie do heed Sargon and shun VidCon thereafter.) Even if this somehow means YouTube banning Sargon, he still wins. (Indeed, retaliation by ANY social media platform at this time only makes Sargon look better.)

While the Wolf Age will soon make this mode of conflict obsolete, while it remains viable do take note of this example and see in it the lessons: Know Your Enemy, Know Yourself, He Who Cares Least Wins. Sure, Sark the Shark will spin this somehow to shirk the blame and stick it on (and to) Sargon, but there's far too much video evidence to let her get away with it. She's done. End of Line.

She just doesn't know that she's going to de-rez yet.

Well done, Sargon. Short of getting the IRS to bust her for tax fraud, this is a telling blow. If it isn't mortal, it will lead to one that is. Victory for Kekistan!

Sunday, June 18, 2017

What Part of "Chicago Rules" Do You NOT COMPREHEND?

I try not to just post something someone else did and call it a day anymore, but Stefan Molyneux nailed it in this video.

He made this video in light of the follow brilliant example of Turnabout-is-Fair-Play organized by Mike Cernovich.

I approve. Wholeheartedly with without reservation. I look forward to more such operations. Why? Because, while the enemy sets of the terms of engagement, after that it's Chicago Rules. Apparently it is necessary to remind people what that is. Here you go.

And, on fucking cue, out come the cucks crying about how doing this is a bad thing.

SHUT! THE FUCK! UP!

It's ranting time, and you're going to sit the fuck down, shut the fuck up, and listen to it from start to finish or I'll break your fucking legs.

Bullies great and small operate exactly as the Left has done. They're predators, and they care first and foremost about getting their way. They will use any rules you follow against you to get their way. That's what Alinsky's Rules For Radicals actually is: formalized, systamatized bullying intended to beat you into compliance with the bully's will.

I know, from a fucking childhood of bitter experience (a) what "cuckservatism" is and how it never works, and (b) that going on the offense and treating predators as the monsters that they are actually gets the job done. What happened at that Shakespeare production was warm-up; what's coming is exactly the escalation that Chicago Rules means. The Left, being rabbits, don't expect (and are not prepared for) actual resistance. Just this alone has already freaked them out.

And yes, the Left will escalate. They already have. Or did you not get what that shooting of the Congressman represents? What's next? Well, Anonymous Conservative already laid it out:

I don’t expect leftist shootings to become significantly more common though we will see them every so often as things go K. The reality is, the vast majority of leftists lack the balls, meaning only a small number of the most whacked will go that route. And judging by the last one, who showed up with an SKS semi-auto rifle to a field full of unarmed targets and failed to kill anyone, they won’t be all that effective. But I do expect leftist r-strategists to amp up the efforts to set in motion increased mortality mechanisms.

What is an increased mortality mechanism? It is a mechanism that increases the likelihood that savages will prey upon the innocent:

Civil War is now INEVITABLE! The Left wants it, and they're going to do what they can to get it while not taking any risks to themselves. The goal now is to ramp up the pressure past the point where the Left can think straight, and thereby force a catastrophic error that will give up all hope of winning to the Right. The Wolf Age is here. Get ready or get eaten. Empire must fall, and fall it shall.

Sunday, June 11, 2017

Pebbles, The Time To Vote Has Passed

For those not paying attention to E3 this weekend, you likely heard about the anti-Sharia protests in the United States and elsewhere. While the lying whores that pretend to be news media gave cover to the pro-Sharia types, what wasn't well-covered were the violent outbursts that occurred. Antifa and their fellow travelers started shit, mostly in cities where their allies already run things, and while no injuries occurred the frequency of these attacks (and the continuing impotency of law enforcement there) means that we're now counting down the days until the shooting starts. Preventing wide-scale violence is now impossible.

For now, I recommend that you participate in the Safe Streets Project, but that will only buy time because it only delays the inevitable. Once Antifa realize that they can't rely on the masks, and they feel their brains about to burst because they can't stand the pressure, they'll cross the line and resort to unmasked violence en masse and double-down again on using their riot-threat to get cities, counties and states to bend the knee. The division of territory will become increasingly obvious.

Global civil war is now inevitable. It's now a question of "When?" and "How?". Hope for the cold war fought in courts, legislatures, and elections- messy as that is. I've studied enough history to know what the alternative, which is the traditional norm, looks like; it's not the (by comparison) clean and orderly way of the American Civil or the English Civil War. All of the dysgenic trends, and the totalitarian trends, make sense when you consider the Western Elites seeking to replace the Western Nations with more pliable peoples from elsewhere that are long-accustomed to being trampled upon by their masters. In short, the elites of Civiliation betrayed it for barbarians they foolishly believe they can yoke and rule. Fools.

The avalanche is coming. The Wolf Age is here. Get ready or get eaten.

Sunday, June 4, 2017

Never Surrender Your Ability to Resist

There are times when someone else beats me to the punch and says what's on my mind better than I can. Today is one of those occasions, and the man is Ivan Throne, with his essay from January 3rd of this year: "Rifles in the Dark". What I say below presumes that you read it.

No, seriously, read it. This man deserves his reputation for intelligence and ruthlessness.

The distrust of the State, even when it is currently being used to your benefit, is justified. One need only be competent in the study of history to see that this is true. Far more often than not, the State is a tool of Empire. It is rare that this is not the case, and it is reliable to see when Empire consumes a State: when the size of the State exceeds the capacity of the Nation to keep it in check by force and culture (i.e. when the line between the people and the government is hard and fast, such that government is a subculture to itself).

So the capacity to resist, and destroy, the State must be maintained at all times. The will, the skill, and the drill are all part of that capacity; one must maintain the mindset to resist and destroy, the knowledge and practice to do so, and the tools--the weapons especially--to do so. For we Americans, this fundamental fact is explicitly preserved in the U.S. Constitution (however degraded that may be now), and as such we have a culture and tradition backing it. Other nations differ, and the quality of their cultures reflects the presence of this truth therein. But empires--being Thralls of Empire--always explicitly attack it and seek to render all nations under their heel weak by disarmament. Throne's right, and he's right because he's just giving voice to the lessons of history.

Europe's seeing this first-hand, repeating the errors of the past, because Empire demands it of its Thralls therein. These traitors threw open the gates and allowed the orcs into the West. They cover for the orcs' predations, and prey upon the Men of the West in turn. With knives at our backs and spears at our chests, it is no wonder many feel pressed upon. Yet once we see whom to act upon first, and how, the answers to "where, when, why, and to whom" will fall into place and rapidly occur. (We're beginning to see early efforts now, such as the Safe Streets Project- an effort Throne is associated with.) Resistance will escalate. This is a Wolf Age; get ready or get eaten.

Empire--and, consequently, empires--must fall. It's the only way for Mankind and Civilization to survive.

Sunday, May 28, 2017

Brilliance in Rhetoric: #OrcPosting

I started seeing stuff like this over my Twitter feed this weekend, and goddamn is it glorious and brilliant.

If you want more, you know what to do: search Twitter under #OrcPosting and enjoy the hilarity.

This is brilliant and effective rhetoric in action, as the Supreme Dark Lord noted previously. There's nothing difficult to grasp here: it's using pics from the various Middle Earth films, captioned with pro-Globalist SocJus propaganda (i.e. pro-Empire) with words swapped to show just how stupid, racist, and discivic that fraudulent ideology really is- and these memes are far superior at doing what the pro-SJW memers do, which makes the rhetoric doubly-effective upon the audience.

And the best part? The aforementioned Thralls of Empire have no defense against it. They can try to cite Tolkien's letters and other peripheral works, but it will fall on deaf ears and the smarter ones know it. I know what some of the bolder ones will try to do, but we have our counter ready: READ! ANOTHER! BOOK!. Again, the smarter Thralls know this and therefore will just say to let this blow over.

Fat fucking chance. We'll make the Hoaxing Media cover this as a legit story, just like we did for Kekistan, and then apply the pattern to something else just as powerful in terms of culture. We'll meme them to death, and then meme their memory to death. Empire will fall.

Sunday, May 21, 2017

Borders Bring Civilization

Boundaries are borders. Borders mean something if, and only if, you are willing and able to enforce them.

The same people who demand no borders for the movement of people or capital will fly off the handle if you challenge their social dogma (violate social boundaries), question why they go after your economic or private life (violate your economic or social boundaries), and gainsay their philosophical assumptions (violate their mental boundaries).

This does not need a long explanation. Borders bring Civilization, first by their defense and then by their respect. Barbarism, especially Empire, comes from predatory behavior of the sort that's done because the predator cannot or will not sustain themselves by themselves for themselves. (For all you r/K types, this is r-type predation because they go where the resources are and go all Locust Crusade to get them.) There is no reasoning with them; you not only build and man that wall, you get ruthless with them (regardless of the skin they wear) when found. There is no reasoning with the ravenous hordes of savages and their sweet-talking sorcerers who beguile their way to power. There is only war. War to the knife. War to the hilt.

Civilization exists only when there are hard borders held by hard men appreciated by loyal wives and dutiful children. Softness is taken as weakness, time and again, and the hordes win when the hardness is gone. Every single fucking time.

Sunday, May 14, 2017

It's The Nukes, Stupid

It's Mother's Day today, and my mother is a great cook, so I'm going to make this quick so I can and enjoy the first grilling event this year.

First, to set this up, this video from SGT Report. One of his regular beats is the fragile world economy, and how the US Dollar is DOOMED! (This is wrong, I will explain below.)

What this video, and these people in general don't want to admit (if they understand it at all), is that the world economy does not work that way. It's very frustrating because, as a group, they do know the political basis of the economy and call it out by name: The Petrodollar.

For those not in the know, the Petrodollar is this simple: The military of the United States secures Saudi Arabia's oil fields, and the Saudis return the favor by selling oil only in US Dollars. What all these wankers whining about this arrangement fail to grok is what that means.

The US Nuclear Weapons Stockpile backs the US Dollar.

The US nukes backs the US military, which backs the oil that's sold in US Dollars. The nukes fly if the Petrodollar dies. That's what all of the players in the game understand, which is why the system will go on indefinitely; until the US nukes are taken out, one way or another, the world economy will remain dominated by the US (Petro)Dollar. Yes, folks, it really is that simple and easy. All the wanking about currency, fractional reserves, and so on means nothing until they find a way to take out the nukes; it really is "Comply or Fry", and the world doesn't want to fry.

Sunday, May 7, 2017

The Global Civil War is Here

After the surprise of Trump's election last Fall, it should be no surprise to find the Thralls of Empire--the Lords of Perception--working overtime to fix future election results to their liking. Wilders, and now Le Pen, are already behind the 8-ball due to the Thralls importing a replacement electorate specifically designated to prey upon and replace the native one. Continental Europe will remains within the grasp of Empire until the native nations therein accept that their governments are traitors in league with the invaders and act accordingly. Another Brexit WILL NOT BE ALLOWED!

The governments of the West are dominated, if not wholly owned, by those who seek the annihilation of the West--of Civilization--and therefore they are at war with the very nations that they claim to serve. But they don't, observably and confessedly so, due to their false god of Progressivism (really Satan by a new name; same lie, new costume) and they threw open the gates to Civilization's enemies in hopes of using those barbarians to slaughter the native warriors with the prize of their women as the inducement. (Same scheme; different trappings.)

Political processes will continue to degrade as it becomes necessary for the Thralls to do so in order to keep their scheme in place and their plans on track. They know that soon elections and protests will cease to even seem viable Antifa running riot was the sign; the political violence can only escalate from here to full--and total--civil war across the West, and then to full total war between the countries of the West until either the Thralls or Civilization is victorious. There will be war, and only war, for the rest of the 21st century.

And no, don't think this won't damage Russia or China--who, contrary to what many claim, are not (and never have been) friends--because once the West descends into war there will be nothing to keep China from stabbing Russia in the back and restarting their old conflict. The Third World, bereft of First and Second World intervention, will descend into chaos and barbarism even faster than it is now, so any Great Black/Brown Hope is less than a fantasy.

Right now, the sole hope for there for Civilization is for the United States and the United Kingdom to (a) clean house of their own Thralls as fast as they can, (b) throw out all of the aliens and foreigners (starting with the Muslims) no less fast, and (c) reorganize their countries accordingly to no longer allow future importation of incompatible nations into their homelands. (Something like what happens in Victoria is now the best possible result.)

War is upon you, whether you like it or not, and now it's just a matter of time before the shooting starts in earnest across the West.

Sunday, April 30, 2017

The Lords of Perception Laugh at STEM

For some time now, there's been a push to get those who attend university to eschew any degree that isn't a Science, Engineering, Technology, or Mathematics degree (STEM).

The ruling oligarchy, the Lords of Perception, laugh at this. They know from generations of experience what the STEM fields really are: Skilled Labor. Outside of those studying Psychology or Economics, sweet fuck-all of the STEM fields pose a threat to the real power that runs this world--and has run this world--since the Dawn of Mankind.

In short, STEM Lords rule nothing. When push comes to shove, the oligarchy can, has, and will sacrifice them to maintain control. Why? Because the Lords of Perception DO NOT NEED THEM! There's a reason that I call "Empire" as in opposition to Civilization, and not synonymous with it: its fundamental process for feeding has no need of science, engineering, technology, or mathematics and so they are expendable luxuries. Savage barbarism works just fine for this predatory addict, and therefore the same is true of its Thralls--the Lords of Perception--that serve it.

Take a good look at the various dynasties, oligarchies, and other elites that have or do run this planet. They rely on religion, on psychology, on money-power (banking), and on maintaining the loyalty of a Praetorian class. They care about the masses only insofar as said masses remain useful to them; they use the manipulation of perception at multiple levels to do this, using methods heretofore kept secret to all but themselves. If anything, too-advanced a state of science or technology is a threat to their power because a critical mass of people catch on to their scams.

If you want to be useful to Civilization, you become a STEM Lord. If you want actual power, you go into some field of practical manipulation of perception: International Relations, Public Relations, Marketing, Law, Journalism, Political Science. You do that, and you bend the knee. You drink the demon blood. You take the Mark of the Beast. You become a Thrall of Empire, and start to scheme your way to the top (or presume that you'll get it giving to you because that's what your parents did- looking at you, Jeb and Chelsea).

Now you see why Roosh V, Mike Cernovich, Ivan Throne, and others like them get the hate from Empire's Thralls: they know what the real game is, where the real power lies, and will not bend the knee. The Lords of Perception do NOT share power!

Sunday, April 23, 2017

The Avalanche Has Begun. It's Too Late For The Pebbles To Vote.

I'm watching the results of the first round of elections in France, and I'm seeing that Le Pen made it through to the second round. The Establishment media in France and outside of it are doing as they did for Brexit and Trump: predicting Le Pen's loss. I'm expecting two things: that they're going to fix the second round, and that Le Pen will win anyway. Once Le Pen wins, the European Union will go from talking like threatened despots to acting like them and reveal by deed the true scope of the EU and attempt to "fix" the French elections in the name of preserving the Union.

The French nation and its civic adherents are starting to see that the Leftist/Globalist Establishment will not fulfill the State's duty of defense that justifies its existence. As with the American nation and its civic adherents, the French see in Le Pen a last viable option prior to taking up the duty and discharging it themselves. They will demand the removal of the aliens and the foreigners known to be hostile to them and theirs, as is ongoing in the United States and elsewhere that this has occurred. There will be no tolerance of opposition to this policy, as it is rightly seen as sedition and treason to maintain hostile populations within one's borders.

When Le Pen wins, expect the French State to do what President Trump has so far been unable or unwilling to do: declare all of the enemy organizations to be terrorists, and bring the full might of the State against them. The French State must also exit the European Union at best speed, reintroduce the Franc as its sovereign currency, seize the independent central bank and replace it with a State-owned/State-run central bank to handle all its finances (accompanied by a permanent ban on independent central banking) on the grounds of national security (which is not a lie; it IS). All of the hostile aliens and foreigners, and the traitors that aid and abet them, must be seized immediately, condemned as spies and saboteurs, and summarily executed as such.

The Establishment will screech like banshees. Fuck them. This is what it will take. Why? Because those hostile aliens, foreigners, and traitors will not admit defeat and just leave France to the French. They will double-down and become far more violent in their resistance. The State will have to resort to such measures just to fulfill its fundamental mission and duty to the French nation. This is, quite literally, a "cruel to be kind" scenario; it's what Vlad Dracul had to do, and for the same reasons. If the French nation is to survive the 21st Century, such severe measures must be taken.

Empire must fall. That doesn't mean it will be easy, pleasant, or convenient- ridding oneself of a violent, predatory addict never is. But it is the most viable option, and that's why once it is clear that this must be done that it will be done. Civilization is worth fighting for.

Sunday, April 16, 2017

The Violence Seen in Austin & Berkeley Will Continue

Normally, I'm far more serious and cerebral in my tone. After yesterday's street fight at the University of California at Berkeley, something a little more everyman is in order. Such as this:

I've been watching, along with many others, the increasing antifa activity since the Ascension of the God-Emperor. Yesterday's street fights, which included the The Strong Independent (((Woman))) What Don't Need No Man finding out the hard way that Equality Is A Fraud. If I hadn't been a regular reader of The Anonymous Conservative, this behavior would still be puzzling to me. (Read the blog; puzzle pieces fall into place, completing the big picture.)

This is not going to de-escalate. It's going to keep ramping up because the backers want the antifa to keep freaking out and acting on their cognitive dissonance. On the same day as the fight in California, Mike Cernovich got jumped at an event (and did a good job exposing the attackers as pathetic by counter-punching for effect) in Austin, Texas. While Austin is SJW-friendly, most of Texas is not; antifa that try their tactics outside of friendly zones will legally get shot, even killed, as criminals.

The Establishment Media's management of these events' happenings is telling in who they're for: antifa. The tells are in the language used in the reports, the footage that accompanies the language, and the presentation of that footage- it's all about the perception of pro-Free Speech side as being the dangerous ones, an inversion of the truth. In other words, SJWs Always Lie. Why? Because they want to escalate. Why? Because, for now, escalation serves their Narrative (or so they think).

The reality is that the perception to the contrary, where the truth of antifa being the belligerents and the police getting stand-down orders (again) from the city, is what's getting out hard and fast via the Internet. This explains many of the moves over the last year, escalating recently with demonitization and shadow-banning on multiple social media platforms: Establishment Media lost control over the perception of the younger generations, and react by locking down the Internet as best they can to force them back on the legacy media that they still control (and failing to do so, so far).

We're going to see more of this violence in the streets, and not just in the United States. European cities are long overdue for the native nations to accept that their governments have betrayed them in favor of the proven-violent invaders that they fostered. (Yes, my European friends, your governments see you as a threat to them; that's why they threw open the gates and do nothing to stop the violence against you.) Once the governments show their loyalties (by whom they use the law, as a weapon, again), that's when the game is properly afoot and we accelerate into a global civil war.

The only way to stop that from happening is for nationalist political parties and movements to peacefully seize power now, and once gotten use the Rule of Law to end Empire's use of its Thralls and the hostile barbarians that they let in through the gates- permanently. Root-and-branch, then the earth salted. Delenda est, because they want to do it to us.

Sunday, April 9, 2017

Perception Management In Action

Perception management in action. That's what this thing in Syria is about. If you want to change something in the political world, the cultural world, or other world of Man then learning how to wield perception--like it or not (and no, I don't)--is key to actually getting anything substantial done. It is a key, if not the key, to power for all but a handful of people.

To that end, factual reporting alone is insufficient. It is necessary, but insufficient; most people are not, never have, and never will be persuaded by facts or evidence- this is Dialectic, and the majority of Mankind is hopelessly illiterate in Dialectic, making it useless by itself. You have to hit them emotionally, symbolically, and that means Rhetoric.

This is why the media is all about the use of narrative (and always has been; let's not lie to ourselves) to shape perceptions, with Dialectic reserved only for internal discussions (because they're already sufficiently aligned to make this useful). This is why most anti-Empire resistance fails. It's too reliant on Dialectic, and disdainful of Rhetoric. Dilbert-creator Scott Adams points this out routinely via his "Master Persuader" series at his blog

And now we come to the "in action" part: Trump and Syria.

The established expectation is that Trump will pursue an isolationist foreign policy. As much as I would like that, it is not a realistic expectation. The United States, as the current leg-breaker of Empire, has foreign entanglements all across the globe; as it does not have control over its finances, and much of the personnel--elected and appointed--comprising the Federal governments many and varied agencies (including the military) has severe incentives to comply with Empire instead of oppose it. President Trump, if he is to fulfill all of his campaign promises, has to do what everyone pursuing an agenda must do: assess, prioritize, and then act on high priority objectives first at the cost of lower ones.

Until the Syria move, Trump faced a relentlessly hostile domestic Establishment and with it a relentlessly hostile media environment. Without sufficient counter-media presence, the Establishment media's story about Trump would prevail over the voting population over time; Trump knows the value of the perception game--this is the man behind The Art of the Deal--so he knows (like Sun Tzu) when to let go of what isn't working to pursue your ends.

Now the media's become much more friendly, at the cost of antagonizing his base of support, but the media's story shifted to tell the tale of how that base of support--the same base that voted him into the White House--is marginal and irrelevant, safe for Trump to ignore in favor of "wiser voices" (i.e. them). This means that Trump got them to change their story about him, at the cost of them defaming his supporters instead.

The other thing about the Syria story is that, due to the Internet changing everything, others who know the game can intervene to steer perception to their liking. Mike Cernovich demonstrated a few weeks ago that he knows this game very well when he set up 60 Minutes in a power-play that established him as someone to reckon with, a play he followed up with his breaking the story (See? That's what this is- storytelling.) about Susan Rice that compelled a media cycle on its own, and now he's put his hand on the Syria matter by by exposing traitors in Trump's camp playing him.

Yes, Mike Cernovich single-handedly changed a media cycle. First the usual alt-media outlets (e.g. WeAreChange) picked it up, then others followed until it passed within the view of the Establishment media- who have to report on it. He's forcing the Establishment--Empire's Thralls in the media, particularly--to struggle with him (David v. Goliath story) over the direction of the on-going narrative of Trump. He's messing with their perception management scheme. Thereby he's resisting Empire far better, and far more efficiently, than anyone else.

Why?

Because he's better at telling stories, and he's telling stories that people clamor to hear.

And that is the core of perception management in action. Use the language of narrative as Rhetoric to persuade people to go as you want by getting them to commit emotionally to your desired position, short-circuiting reason and logic to get things done- the same as the masters of Mankind have done forever. As I said before: Life is a solved problem.. Empire knows this; only by obscuring the truth does it endure. Solve the problem, and Empire must fall.

Sunday, April 2, 2017

On the Importance of Perception

Three boys become apprentices of a famous magician. One boy becomes a successful and famous magician in his own right, succeeding his master, bringing joy to a world in need of it. One boy becomes a master criminal, using his skills to swindle fortunes from the gullible and buy protection from the authorities by swindling their secrets. One boy becomes a master inquisitor, using his skills to expose fraud and heresy, destroying their names before ending their lives.

What is common between them? All of them learned, at an early age, on the truth about the truth and how Mankind deals with it- in short, on what perception is, and how "magic" is really the manipulation of perception to create illusions and enchant others in order to pursue your goals. Why? Because Mankind is not a rational species, just a rationalizing one, and as such showmanship as part of a larger array of Rhetorical techniques is reliably effective.

The world that is, like it or not, is a world that is run by the management of perception. This is not new; it's ancient, and as such a lot of the "secret societies" teachings revolve around using ritual and word-salad to obfuscate their knowledge of perception to only those they find sufficiently trustworthy to be taught that knowledge. The masters of perception sometimes become the ones on the thrones of the earth, but often are just one or two steps removed; the powers behind the thrones.

The change between then and now is the Internet. For the first time, the knowledge once hidden from the masses is freely available; men like Mark Passio give away the secret knowledge, de-occuling that known as "the occult", and more prosaically you have videos of people teaching magic tricks on YouTube. The knowledge of practical techniques using perception to deceive, such as card tricks, sleight-of-hand tricks, etc. now make viable wider expansion of the principles and philosophy that make them work and give people motive to learn and master them.

I'm going to put it simply: you are wise to learn both the techniques and the means by which they work because this is how the most dangerous predators within Mankind identify prey, assess ease of predation, and go about executing their kills. Deception is key to successful predation, so knowing their ways means defending against them. Empire is the supreme predator on Mankind, so to defend against it you must know its ways; true freedom cannot come to sheep.

Sunday, March 26, 2017

The Big Lie Is Not a 20th Century Technique

Shilling--the practice of advocating a position without openly acknowledging one's status as an agent of the position's beneficiary--is not new. It's old, damn old, and it is long past time to dig into the past to see where the big ideas of the past come from.

When I went to graduate school, I focused on the origins of John Locke's philosophy. What I'm putting into this post is the TL/DR version, necessarily abbreviated for length and summarized accordingly. There's enough here for a proper book; I read several (and a bunch of letters) in making this M.A. thesis happen.

The summary is this: Locke was a poor kid who had just enough scratch to buy a proper education, got it, got status anxiety as the price for it, and decided that life as a non-clerical academic in an academia dominated by clerics was a sureshot for dealing with his life. It wasn't; got tossed when he ran afoul of the orthodoxy due to his own efforts ands got tossed out after a youth and early adulthood in the Ivory Tower of academia.

Using what few connections outside academia he made, he got into contact with the first Earl Shaftsbury and moved into his house. Over the next two or so years, everything he'd spend the rest of his life publishing and promoting got stuck into his brain by his patron. Aside from some clerical work in officialdom and tutoring the Second & Third Earls, that's what he did- he wrote down, revised, etc. the political, social, economic, and cultural philosophies that directly and immediately benefited his patron and allies thereof. The man even published using allied printers.

Why does this matter? Because the 1st Shaftsbury was the head of the liberals of the day, the Whig Party, and at one time had control of the state- a power used as one expects, to benefit themselves at the expense of enemies and rivals. Shaftsbury also had business interests that directly benefited from the very economic and political positions that Locke advocated, and the Earl (and his son and grandson) rewarded their pet intellectual for his efforts properly.

This is not to say Locke is wrong per se, but it does mean that Locke is suspect and therefore every claim he made after coming under Shaftsbury's patronage must be audited, interrogated, and either confirmed or denied. All of you that are skeptical of Modernity, you've got good reason for your doubts now.

As I said above, there's enough here for a book to properly investigate this; I'd adapt and expand my M.A. thesis into such if I could focus on it full-time.

Sunday, March 19, 2017

Utopia Is Impossible. Stop Trying.

Christians, and those that know their Bible, will remember the Tower of Babel. They will remember that this a utopian scheme, meant to bind all the nations together with a common tongue under a common rule as that elite sought to unseat God by breaching Heaven to do so. Well before that could happen, God smote the Tower. He scattered the nations and confused their language.

That's a parable, folks, and far too few took the lesson. Utopia is impossible, and it is impossible because Natural Law will never allow for it.

That makes Utopia a lie, a big lie, and it is no surprise that Utopia is often found hand-in-hand with Empire. Why? Because to achieve and sustain a utopia, especially over time, you need an imperial regime to enforce it. Imperial regimes require the yoking of disparate nations under the same authority, and all of the emergent behaviors that always occur when diverse nations are put into close proximity are part-and-parcel with utopian schemes. If Empire is the hardcore junky strung out on smack, Utopia is the sloppy lush that talks nice but can't keep herself together.

Every utopia fails. They fail because the consequences of their contradictions finally hollow them out and cause them to collapse, which is exactly how empires falls, and often by the same ultimate event: insiders turn traitors and throw open the gates to hostile outsiders.

And yes, I do mean every utopia. The excuse is irrelevant; the results are the same: oppression, poverty, misery, and death- lots and lots of easily preventable, avoidable, and often deliberately-inflicted death. Its psychology is that of a willful child, insisting that it has to work despite how many times it previously failed. The politics that demand that Big Daddy handle it all, and make the meanies go away, stems from every last damned utopian scheme and scam ever attempted- and the solution is also the same: Let. It. Fall.

There is no substitution for the Father. Not in the family. Not in the household. Not in the community. Not in the culture. Not in the nation. Not in the state. Not in the individual human heart and soul. Utopia is fundamentally the psychology of a deluded woman, thinking that everything will be all right with just enough magical thinking to go with magical economics, and then going "How did this happen?!" when Natural Law--God's rod of smiting--comes up to say "NOPE!" and once more restore the lawful order of Mankind's existence.

Stop trying. It won't happen. It won't because it can't happen. It can't because Natural Law does not allow it. Stop falling for this scam. Stop being Utopia's cuck and sucker, using you for Empire's gain. Empire must fall, and so must Utopia.

Sunday, March 12, 2017

No Place for Rabbits

"The perfect is the enemy of the good."

Never has this been more obvious to me than in looking at my own side in the culture war. Both that those of my allies are not (and, I am certain, some cannot be) perfect examples of what needs to be to win, and that some are willing to do what they can here and now to make victory happen. They can't have their cake and eat it too; this is a world for wolves, not rabbits.

Empire, like any addict, is inherently rabbit-like in its psychology. When it cannot satisfy its insatiable hunger, it turns violent in an attempt to do so in the hope that the sudden spasm will terrorize the others into compliance. Why? Because it cannot avoid believing that any disruption of supply is the result of either incompetence or hostile action resulting in supply being withheld. Unable to see that there are other explanations, it presumes ill intent and acts to quash that threat by any means at its disposal.

The result, when it works, is the start of a downward spiral to ruin. It is the psychology that we see arise time and again in declines and collapses. (Which means that rabbit-thinking is addict-thinking, because the processes are the same and so are the results if left unchecked.) However, there is another aspect to this that can be and should be considered: when provided with an out, once conditions become intolerable the rabbit flees for easier conditions- and so will addicts. Empire will do likewise.

The good here is to attack the things that produce the easy conditions that Empire desires to feed its gluttonous lusts. A free people does entirely for themselves; what aid exists is entirely private, comes with eu-civic conditions, and exists solely for the purpose of rehabilitating rescues while repurposing the broken- and then, it is only for one's nation. Never for aliens or foreigners.

The perfect is to create a parallel structure and then break away from the rabbit warren to live apart until the warren collapses, and then break out to finish off the survivors. This is necessary, but not sufficient. Focusing on this alone isn't enough; attacking the sources of the rabbit-friendly conditions is required, and that means undoing all of the things done in a mistaken pursuit of compassion for parties that have proven to be incompatible with Civilization.

Star Trek will never happen because of evolutionary psychology, so stop trying to flout Natural Law. This is a world for wolves. Civilization is built by wolves for wolves, and not for rabbits. Empire is a rabbit- and rabbits are for eating.

Sunday, March 5, 2017

Predators Piss On Pacifists

Pacifism.

I understand the appeal of pacifism. Refusing to do violence, as a matter of principle, to resolve your conflicts isn't that out of line. While violence--raw, naked force--is the universal solvent, that doesn't mean that it's the best tool for the job. That said, the reason that pacifism gets the bad reputation is that it takes the general good idea of restraint and irrationally pushes that restraint to the point of being maladaptive to the threat at hand.

In short, pacifism is for prey and it signals to predators great and small that here stands a meal for the taking- and that is exactly what becomes of any unit who so embraces pacifism that it ceases to know when to stop refraining from using force and start using it good and hard to best possible effect.

Empire is a predator. It sees pacifists as fools, fuckwits, and food- as prey. A thing to consume and crap out, not something at all worthy of respect or consideration. If someone or some group refuses to defend itself and its own, so much the better; feast on their flesh, rest easy on their bones, and move on to the next prey.

That's not how this world works. It has not been, is not now, nor shall it ever be how this world works. As the old saying goes, If you want peace, prepare for war.

The same goes for cultural warfare as for physical warfare. Predators will use whatever means work to sucker prey into lower their guard; predators, by their nature, are not interested in fair fights for anything and if they can sucker you into pacifism they'll do it- and then they'll eat you. Dead is dead- how you die is not relevant.

Sunday, February 26, 2017

Without the Father, Nothing Endures

I've spent some time recently renewing my acquaintance with The Godfather and its sequels. The reason I did so was that a recurring theme came to mind, that of loyalty to the family (and Family), with the attendant duty to refrain from behavior that outsiders are not to witness. This behavior serves to undermine the Godfather--the patriarch--as he executes his supreme duty to safeguard and pursue the family's interests, making him seem other than capable and powerful- and thus not to be preyed upon (i.e. disrespected). It is also what drives Michael's sister, Connie, to push his son to supersede him in the third film.

These dynamics are not purely fictional. Change the context, and it becomes the story of a political dynasty navigating the treachery seas of dynastic politics. Change it again, and you get House of Cards. The reason that context merely changes the trappings without changing the behaviors is because of this: the family is the natural unit of Mankind, and all else that is lawful in Mankind's existence is an outgrowth of it.

We are now, globally, observing that this is true. We call this "identity politics", but it is really the reality of Mankind's existence in all of recorded history and most of the current world. The West's deviation is an aberration, and renewed exposure is going to put an end to this heresy--and it is a heresy--soon enough, because if it does not then the West shall cease to exist. The nations currently exploiting the West (with the help of traitors in the states of the West) have no qualms about putting the West to the sword for no other reason than that they are not Westerners and shall not preserve it.

Nations arise as outgrowths of families, through the mechanisms of extended kinship in clans and tribes, and kingdoms emerge when a single father-figure must emerge for the smooth execution of the duty to preserve the nation-family from predators without as well as fools within. (There is such a thing as too much talk at the wrong time.) The issue thereafter is the formalization and ossification of an emergent lawful hierarchy into artifice that does not reflect the shifting circumstances that life imposes; who is king must change when the circumstances shift too severely for the current crown to meet them, something ordinarily done with the simple passage of time and encounters with hostiles taking their toll.

The limit of an authority to respond effectively to predatory threats is the actual boundary condition for any authority, be it the lawful authority of a family (at any scale) or the artifice of a state (similarly, or subset thereof, such as a military). The question of legitimacy turns on this capacity, and people will accept many hardships and restrictions on individual agency so long as their father-figure is seen to effectively execute the duties put to him. It is no accident that political thought equates the people to children, for without the wisdom of the father too many too often are little more than children- and this very well-known phenomenon is proof of a fundamental quality of Mankind's nature, one that cannot be changed.

The answer to the matter of Empire is to acknowledge this as Natural Law, and to abandon everything that denies it in favor of reforming one's communities and societies into lawful reflections of this fact. Patriarchy is Natural Law.

Sunday, February 19, 2017

Life is a Solved Problem

I have reason to believe that all of life is a solved problem.

The reason I say so is that all of the issues Mankind faces today are problems faced before, sometimes successfully and sometimes not. The causes are the same, the phenomena through which these problems arise and proceed are the same, and therefore so are the solutions. We already know what to do to solve the problem. This is the definition of a solved problem.

So we are dealing with a lack of will coupled with a lack of clarity caused by deliberate deception. Those pushing the problem (for whatever reasons) are lying to the rest of us for their own benefit, which makes what they are doing fraud and thus inherently predatory. The problems are solved; all that needs be done is to apply the solution.

Ultimately, what this means is simple: to declare clearly what the problem is, who is responsible for it, and execute them all for their predatory behavior. Zombies, et. al., are not real: corpses cannot (and therefore do not) reoffend, so killing those who do you or yours harm is not wrong, not a crime, and not even offensive. It is laudable, necessary, and expected of anyone seeking to get and remain free from Empire.

Apply the solutions. Empire cannot withstand Natural Law, which is what that means. Empire must fall.

Sunday, February 12, 2017

The Rules That Exist Are Those Enforced

(Note: This post follows on from last week's post.)

The thing that distinguishes the Law of Nature from the Law of Man is that the latter does not enforce itself. Even children grasp this fact, summarized so brilliantly in this playground retort: "Make me."

Government is about control. You can proclaim all the rules you want, but if you cannot compel compliance then your words are senseless blather and what respect you have soon drains away. When speaking of self-government, starting with the individual, we term this "discipline" and rightly regard a lack of it as a mark of poor character. Individuals do what they do not want to secure benefits or necessities they want or need. As it is for individuals, so it is for groups of any size.

The difference is that enforcement externalizes in groups. The rule-maker relies on enforcers to compel compliance. This is true when the rule is reasonable, right, and proper as when it is not; the reason it is so is because the power to compel compliance means removing the power to act from those one seeks compliance from.

This is why competent rule creation rests upon shaping the ability of those targeted to comply, instead of relying upon argument of any kind; if the capacity to disobey is crippled, depreciated, or eliminated then you need not rely on enforcers as often or as severely to gain compliance. Use technical means over other options whenever you can, because their opinion of the rules is irrelevant is they lack the means to defy it.

Go back to that retort: "Make me". That's what has to be kept in mind when you go about making rules; if you can't make them comply, then your rule will be defied. It is the same if the defiance is reasonable or not, because you lack the means to enforce your will. Control over others necessarily requires possessing the means to destroy what they value most, for otherwise you have nothing to negotiate with.

Make no mistake; enforcement is negotiation. You're using violence (actual or the threat thereof) to say "Compliance is your better option." If you are unable to do this, then your rules--for all intents and purposes--do not exist. Being unwilling is the same as being unable, with the sole difference being the speed of remedy.

This is the practical part of power being in the ability to act, and never in deliberation or judgement. There are plenty of people deliberating on anything and everything; they lack the ability to act, so their opinions can be (and often are) ignored as they can't act on them. Plenty of people make judgments, but also cannot act on them, and are just as impotent so they too get ignored. The open hand and the closed fist matter far more than tomes of law or the councils of the wise, as every man whose dealt with the unruly and predatory knows to his cost.

And it is because human predators exist that the rules must be enforced--and seen to be enforced; invisible enforcement is no enforcement--for them to have their desired effect. The unruly can be cowed; predators must be exterminated without mercy or hesitation, as they brook no other limit to their predation, and they regard non-resistance as weakness (and weakness as consent to their predations).

Fortunately, this is a solved problem. The issue now is the unwillingness to apply the solution.

Sunday, February 5, 2017

The Power That Matters Is The Power To Act

I find it interesting that people still think that a spoken or written proclamation is identical to forcing compliance with one's will. If there is a fatal flaw in any system of control, it is in thinking that merely changing what those rules or regulations or proclamations are will itself be sufficient to remedy undesired results.

It's not. It never has. It never will. The real power is in enforcement--in action--and not in deliberation or judgement. This belief is naive and not to be found in the world's elites, or in their counterparts in the underworld. Just as the Rule of Law is not a suicide pact, neither is it (when it works) denying reality; its efficacy relies on possession of might superior to all that challenge it, same as any other governing regime.

John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it!

The reason that the dividing line is between speech and action is because speech is nothing until you act on it. Words are meaningless without deeds, and don't lie and say otherwise because you know that's true. You can talk all the shit you want. You can pontificate on all the principles you like. You can stand forth and proclaim the Good News until the day you die. If no action comes of those words, then they were never spoken at all.

So let the black-robed priests of the Law Cult waive their papers and declare Black is White. They are voices without flesh, and rely on others to give their words substance. Let the deliberators consider this, that, the other thing, and stuff. Even their possession of the purse no longer holds the power it once did, and otherwise they too are without substance. Only he who acts has power; everyone else merely appropriates that power by fooling the actor otherwise. The mindful, aware actor is the most powerful man alive- and Empire fears him and him alone.

Sunday, January 29, 2017

Empire Forbids Borders: All Within It, None Without It

A nation without borders is not a nation.

As I write this, President Trump (affectionately, "The God-Emperor") issued Executive Orders implementing a series of restrictions upon the travel of foreigners into the United States. The hoaxing media focuses on the restriction on visa from five Muslim countries, and the ACLU's crowing on obtaining an emergency stay on it (which I will talk about below), omits details inconvenient to their narrative.

Yep, that's right: this is the God-Emperor repurposing Obama's own policies--intended to foster the current Muslim invasion of the West on behalf of Empire--towards the end of protecting and reinforcing the sovereignty of the United States of America, and through it to that of the several States in this federal republic. As a political act, this is an act of civic patriotism and not nationalism per se; it will, in time, build the foundation for protecting the American nation once more. In short, this is necessary, but not sufficient work to put down Empire.

Every nation, if it is to survive and thrive must establish its boundaries and defend them against all comers. As individuals must do, so must the nations. Instead of homesteads, nations found countries, but the principles are the same and so is their execution. Therefore, the God-Emperor (acting as a metaphorical patriarch) has the duty (and therefore the right) to determine who can or cannot come into the country- and this fact is recognized in the U.S. Code:

Which means that the ACLU's crowing about that stay order means precisely jack and shit on two levels. Not only is the order illegal (as that quote shows, the POTUS has the power), but the courts have no enforcement power of their own and instead rely on the Executive to comply; the God-Emperor is within his rights to refuse, and only Congress (via their power over the purse) has any real ability to do anything about it- and they won't right now.

The freakout reaction is telling as to how deep the corruption of Empire is in the West, as the Thralls in the hoaxing media across the West got in on the act. What this means is very simple: the education and media establishments have flat-out lied not only to the American nation (and those of other nations holding citizenship), but to all the nations that they control via the governments and media institutions that they hold.

The freakouts are denying the right to self-defense by a country by their actions.

Aliens and foreigners do not have a right to be anywhere that they do not belong, and that especially includes countries belonging to other nations. We call the attempt to do so, rightly, "invasion" and the successful attempt "conquest"- and immigration always means invasion, as our past shows with vivid detail.

The Muslim invasion of Europe, and now into North America, Australia, and New Zealand--aided and abetted by the Thralls in government and the media betraying their own nations to serve Empire--is a real threat that must be dealt with if Empire is to fall. We must have our borders, our fences, our walls--literal and otherwise--for our own safety and prosperity. Insisting otherwise is abuse, recognized for individuals but not for nations, and that is Empire's tell: like any predator, it prefers easy prey, and gaslighting prey into not defending itself is to be expected.

I will not tolerate this. Build the wall, God-Emperor. Ban the predators seeking to come into our land, and get rid of all those already here- no exceptions, and ensure that they are permanently removed. The road is long, but the will is here- Empire will fall.

Sunday, January 22, 2017

The God-Emperor Ascends and Chaos Erupts in Rage

As I write this, Donald Trump just became the 45th President of the United States. I'd like to mock the freakout reactions of people whose egos are still bleeding profusing over this fact, but that's not appropriate because those freakouts are now going beyond merely destroying cars and trucks in the street while rioting (and attacking the police attempting to contain and disperse them) and moving to assaulting people with specific intent to main, cripple, or kill the target.

Two incidents in particular got my attention. The first was Richard Spenser getting sucker-punched by an Antifa zealot who, thanks to those glorious bastards at /pol/, got outed as a literal shit-eating cuckold. The second was the man who came to attend Milo Yiannopoulos's event at the University of Washington at Seattle, and his shooting by an Antifa protestor. The reason these two incidents got my attention is that this showed that the SJWs aren't merely on the losing side of an election contest, but that they're handling it worse than petulant toddlers.

While I am grateful that some of these people are being arrested, so far I have yet to see criminal charges being filed. As many of these riots happen in places where SJWs and their fellow travelers are already in government, and it is known that local police forces--however much they may dislike it--won't risk their jobs or pensions if said SJWs won't let them properly enforce criminal statues, it's not surprising that these incidents only occur where the rabbit warren remains intact.

These are the notable incidents. There are others, such as those assaulted--even injured--the night before at the Deploraball. Property stolen (however minor), people assaulted, people battered, property damaged or destroyed- all of this, coupled with the demonstrated incapacity of local governments to either arrest or prosecute offenders contributes to the mood of chaos that undermines civil order. This is not a good thing. This is not desirable.

Instead, what it means is that both continuation and escalation--remember, someone got shot--are on the table, and both of these are coming from the "love and tolerance" liars and hypocrites on the Left. By their deeds, they reveal that their "love" and "tolerance" is as false as everything they claim to believe but never practice when put to it- it's just more fraudulent virtue-signalling, meant to garner and wield power at the Moral Level, where culture matters most. Yet, under the justification of "NAZI!" they claim it proper to do violence to those who are not them.

This won't end well for them.

First, because it will not work on the ostensible target (President Trump and his Administration), and increasingly so to his supporters. Next, because if they won't disavow their violent allies more and more of the rest of us will accept that silence as agreement and react to them accordingly out of rational self-defense. Finally, if the government--local, state, and Federal--doesn't start doing their job and leave it to the people themselves the violence will escalate until it is past the point of no return and civil war is upon us once more.

The Left, quite frankly, needs to learn how to lose gracefully. It's not like they don't know what the long game is--the "March Through the Institutions" shows that--but rather that they keep pulling Starscream-like own-goals. This is "Megatron has gone to the bathroom. I AM NOW THE LEADER OF THE DECEPTICONS!" levels of stupid, and its making otherwise disinterested people take a second look and see how right Trump is to not give them an inch.

I sympathize with people such as the U.K.'s Sargon of Akkad, and his distaste for identity politics and extreme politics in favor of reasoned dialog and dialectical ends meant to resolve contradictions in positions so that all parties concerned get their needs met and concerns heeded. I think that this won't happen, and I have a long childhood of painful experience informing me, that it won't happen because the same SJWs now responsible for this violence DO NOT WANT reasoned dialog. They want power, dominance, and control- total and absolute. How they get it does not matter, and this desire's become an obsession that's deranged and unhinged their subculture utterly. Sanity has abandoned them, and I cannot help but feel pity for them accordingly. I'd rather talk honestly than the alternative, but better an honest war than a fraudulent peace.

So, I'm about done with this post. I can't say anything more at this time that I find useful or relevant, so I'm closing it out with a Stefan Molyneux video and a pity Tweet pic.

Sunday, January 15, 2017

We Blew Up Their Death Star

The game changed this past year.

No one amongst the Thralls of Empire took seriously the possibility that their globalization plans could be slowed, nevermind stopped, so no one in the political, academic, and especially the media Establishments throughout the globalized world took Brexit seriously. They figured that this referendum would come, result in Remain winning, and that's that. (And if not, they figured on forcing revotes until it did.) Well, Brexit did win and the revotes aren't coming- and no, I don't expect the judicial route to nullifying the referendum to work either, as a long-asleep British people are finally realizing that it's on them--and no one else--to ensure that the vote's results become final and past-tense-binding.

As we now know, SJWs Always Lie!. Following that, we also now know SJWs Always Double-Down., and double-down they did when they could not ignore the viability of Donald Trump as a candidate for the Presidency of the United States. One need not look too hard to find all sorts of Internet image memes mocking the willful blindness of the #NeverTrump crowd, the Democrat Party, and especially the Social Justice death cult as they insisted with the delusional zealotry of a heroin addict deep into withdrawl that Crooked Sick Pedo Hillary Clinton would inevitably win the election.

The game that changed was the game of illusionism known as "public relations". In short, someone finally read Saul Alinsky's Rules For Radicals and began using it against Saul's own side. That's not all, however, as we also saw that the lessons of #Gamergate got applied to this election campaign in a most spectacular fashion. Memetic narrative warfare, done with laughter and joy at the lulz to be had, at all levels of U.S. society--including by people in the Trump campaign--complete countered the most powerful institutions of narrative warfare yet devised at their own game.

I cannot understate how big of an upset these two political campaigns are to the global Establishment. The political realignment in London and Washington D.C. is not a minor shuffling of deck chairs; this is a serious political power shift that hasn't happened in over a generation on either side of the Atlantic. The technocrats in Brussels are shitting themselves now, and they're panicking. So yeah, we blew up their Death Star.

You had better believe that more violent options to put down the threat of France, Italy, or any other EU member state breaking free are now on the table. (The "jackals", as John Perkins put it in Confessions of an Economic Hit-Man, are not just for 3rd World operations.) It's just a matter of figuring out if the Thralls have a Thrawn or a dumbass at the helm. Right now I'm thinking it's a dumbass.

And if you're expecting me to start working towards a reference to The Empire Strikes Back, you're not wrong, but we're not there yet. Wait for it.

The game is the management of perception, and starting with #Gamergate that sensibility (and the acumen to make it work) broke containment and got out into the population at-large. Multiple places across the Internet now openly talk about narrative warfare, memetic warfare, the importance of popular support, and 4th Generation Warfare. More books on this are getting out there. More podcasts are getting out there. More people are on speaking tours talking about, and demonstrating by deed, this sort of thing- and the reactions have been either pathetic counter-memetics or far more effective use of violence.

What we did last year was a great thing, and it broken open a window of opportunity by ruthless exploitation of a weakness heretofore unseen by many and ill-believed by many more. Empire is unbeatable, until it isn't- and we found out last year that it's not. "Beatable", however, does not mean "inevitable defeat"; they can turn this around, and violence is likely the way it'll be attempted.

By that, I mean the push-pull scheme of using the migrant invasion to set up the perception of "unacceptable" criminality against certain parts of the population by the invaders and contrast that to the "unacceptable" violence against those same invaders by unwanted parts of the population- a problem that "of course" can only be solved by the imposition of a violent police state with total surveillance at all times backed by a standing occupation force of "police officers".

Why? To get sufficient political cover to do this:


Best Darth Vader Scene EVER by debunkerbuster
If they had Darth Vader, this wouldn't be a metaphor.

So no, we're not out of the woods yet. Not we in the trenches. Not the God-Emperor Ascendant. None of us. Look for tells out of what others (rightly) call "The Deep State", and be ready for Round 2. They're going to ratchet up the pressure, so we've got to adapt and Git Gud; we've got an advantage is that they really haven't updated their playbook in decades, so a lot of the leaks and exposes of old still have value, but they've got institutional power on their side and plenty of normies still aren't aware of what's really going on- and worse, a significant number of them are Morpheus said to Neo in The Matrix:

The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you're inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it.

So, how about it? Ready for the next level? I am. Natural Law is on our side- the Force is with us. Empire must fall.

Sunday, January 8, 2017

Administration: We're Picking Up The Pace

It's time for a change here.

It's a simple and easy one to say, but it's a far bigger one to comprehend. In short, I'm ceasing the practice of only posting here on Sundays. I'm now going to post here whenever I find it relevant and useful to do so, and man has it become necessary to do this. The pace increased, and I've got to pick it up just to not get run over.

So expect more than one post in a week going forward. Further, expect more serial posting, where I spread an exploration or an argument across multiple posts. As such, I'm going to reduce such posts on my main blog accordingly and redirect that attention here.

Yeah, not much to say in this post, but that's fine. I can run my mouth at length later. Sometimes, brevity is appropriate.

Sunday, January 1, 2017

"Fake News" Ain't New. It's Just More Language Destruction.

This "Fake news" thing ain't new, folks. It's a big iteration of what happened a generation or two before you were born, when the last big one hit (while Operation Mockingbird was still officially a thing), so it's time for a bit of a history lesson and how yesteryear made today's cultural context.

“Conspiracy theory” is a term that at once strikes fear and anxiety in the hearts of most every public figure, particularly journalists and academics. Since the 1960s the label has become a disciplinary device that has been overwhelmingly effective in defining certain events off limits to inquiry or debate. Especially in the United States raising legitimate questions about dubious official narratives destined to inform public opinion (and thereby public policy) is a major thought crime that must be cauterized from the public psyche at all costs.

CIA Conspiracy Theory’s acutely negative connotations may be traced to liberal historian Richard Hofstadter’s well-known fusillades against the “New Right.” Yet it was the Central Intelligence Agency that likely played the greatest role in effectively “weaponizing” the term. In the groundswell of public skepticism toward the Warren Commission’s findings on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the CIA sent a detailed directive to all of its bureaus. Titled “Countering Criticism of the Warren Commission Report,” the dispatch played a definitive role in making the “conspiracy theory” term a weapon to be wielded against almost any individual or group calling the government’s increasingly clandestine programs and activities into question.

This important memorandum and its broad implications for American politics and public discourse are detailed in a book by Florida State University political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith, Conspiracy Theory in America. Dr. deHaven-Smith devised the state crimes against democracy concept to interpret and explain potential government complicity in events such as the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the major political assassinations of the 1960s, and 9/11.

CIA Document 1035-960 was released in response to a 1976 FOIA request by the New York Times. The directive is especially significant because it outlines the CIA’s concern regarding “the whole reputation of the American government” vis-à-vis the Warren Commission Report. The agency was especially interested in maintaining its own image and role as it “contributed information to the [Warren] investigation.”

The memorandum lays out a detailed series of actions and techniques for “countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries.” For example, approaching “friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors)” to remind them of the Warren Commission’s integrity and soundness should be prioritized. “[T]he charges of the critics are without serious foundation,” the document reads, and “further speculative discussion only plays in to the hands of the [Communist] opposition.”

The agency also directed its members “[t]o employ propaganda assets to [negate] and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose.”

1035-960 further delineates specific techniques for countering “conspiratorial” arguments centering on the Warren Commission’s findings. Such responses and their coupling with the pejorative label have been routinely wheeled out in various guises by corporate media outlets, commentators and political leaders to this day against those demanding truth and accountability about momentous public events.

(Note: Additional links and info here, in the Description.)

"If you want to enslave a nation, first take away their language." is NOT limited to the plot of Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain, 1984, or Brave New World. It is part-and-parcel with all forms of "scientific dictatorship", wherein would-be technocrats train the population as if they were dogs to behavior as they desire by shaping the size of practical vocabularies and the meanings of words through their control over the media- direct, by ownership, and indirect through cultural institutions (such as schools). Empire, as a meme, has to resort to language corruption and destruction to ensure its domination and thus its survival by inducing dependency upon the host nation its parasitizes. It's not as hard as it seems; it just takes generational increments of time to accomplish and maintenance thereafter.