Always Traitors Within Before Invaders Without

When the elites of a country openly denigrate the nation that created and sustains that country in favor of hostile aliens and foreigners, those elites are guilty of treason and sedition. They are criminals, and they are to be disposed of as criminals ought.

No, that doesn't need any further explanation. There is no nuance here. Either the leaders are loyal to their people, or they are not. If not, they are traitors and deserves to be exterminated and replaced by loyal people who can and will lead properly. The rest is details.

The elites of the West seek to replace the nations of the West with hostile aliens and foreigners. They are guilty. Replace them.

Of Course It's a Gang! (Or "Why Anarchy Fails, Pt. 1138")

There is one thing that the anarchists (the an-caps, if you most be specific) get right it is this: "government" is a gang.

Well fucking duh. The very reason that "legitimacy" is a thing is due to the very real perception of syndicates and governments only differing based on (a) access to Central Bank IOUs ("currency") backed by nothing and (b) the ability to nuke the fuck out of others as a tool of policy enforcement.

I've said it more than once: The only rules that exist are those that are enforced.

Gangs are very basic mechanisms for doing just that: setting rules upon a population within an area, and then enforcing those rules. It's one step up from the family as a model of government; you have an executive, a chain of command, revenue generation, and use of force to establish and maintain the dominant position therein. The "law" is what the shot-callers say it is, enforced by those who have sufficient power to make it so, and the people pay up because it's better than the alternative.

That is a government. Add recognizable turf, and you have a state.

And now you have the most fundamental reason for both how and why all forms of anarchy are nothing but shitshow failures. History records that, inevitably, someone becomes a shot-caller and forms a gang around them; they become the government if they are success in establishing and maintaining dominance in an area.

Every form of government builds off the Family or the Gang, and you're better off using the Family as your model if you have a choice. That, at the least, has a built-in justification for executive benevolence towards subordinates that--ideally--leads to Noblesse Oblige and a healthy regime of Patron-Client relationships, customized for the specifics of a given nation and country.

So, since the State is inevitable, the smart thing to do is to stop whining about it and instead to ensure that it remains a machine under your control and not a cancerous vampire sucking the blood out of one and all. Pick your own damn cotton, ignore rules that can't or won't be enforced, and kill everyone that tries to make you their bitch. That's as close to anarchy as Natural Law allows.

A Free Man's Freedom Begins With a Free Mind

It's that time again, so all last week and through tomorrow there's been the retrospectives and commentaries on 9/11.

The most professional and prominent of them aires on History, and that's "The Road to 9/11". This miniseries has people on to give commentary as the voiceover recounts the official account of various elements leading from the death of Osama bin Ladin's father through to the act itself and its aftermath.

Recall last week's recommendation, Frame Game Radio, and what he focuses upon: the analysis of why something is what it is. In this case, the purpose of emphasizing documentaries and commentaries that present and focus upon only the government line of events serves to frame discussion of 9/11 solely as the establishment (via its media outlets) wishes that discussion take place. Per Noam Chomsky and Bernard Hermann, the ferverence within that frame can be quite significant but it is permitted to be seen and heard with ease. Go out of those boundaries? Out come the knives.

Now, you can take or leave the folks offering different explanations for that event. That's not the point; the point is that the party most desirous--as shown by their deeds, time and again--of shaping opinions regarding things they do have stepped forward yet again to do just that. You, not they, must be the arbiter of what is or is not true and factual.

That is the purpose of Narrative Warfare: to control what is allowed to be said about what is going on, or has gone on, by means of controlling the language used in discussion and disputation of those events. This is practical mind control. You can see this at work with any topic or issue of importance that you want to inquiry about- those with a stake in the outcome routinely attempt to shape the language used so the perspective permitted is one that benefits them. That's what "public relations", etc., are about.

Yes, that's why it is legal for the news to flat-out lie to you. (There is no Federal, state, or local statute forbidding it.)

It's also why, for all legal purposes, "news" is just entertainment. They're all Fake News, and they know it- which is why they resent that this Rhetorical killshot got turned against them. The networks give you Fake News, their cable holdings give you Fake Documentaries, and increasingly even the open entertainment is Fake (because they're replacing lawful narrative craft with political propaganda).

And it can't go on forever. That's what keeps me going- the knowledge of the certainty that this will stop, and when it does the reckoning will be terrible and glorious. As the Man in Black said before he died:

If you are not free between your ears, then no other form of freedom matters. Think! Especially if it's illegal.

Narrative Warfare: Recommendation - Frame Game Radio

I rarely do recommendations on this blog. I am about to do so. The reason is because the referrant offers a practical education on a vital skill that you do not get otherwise, often even if you work in the field, and once you see what's taught you will see why you did not get taught this previously.

I recommend that you find, follow, and study the messages of Frame Game Radio. Thread summaries can be found here. Twitter account is here, YouTube account is here, and Gab account is here.

You want to follow him on Twitter and Gab because of his Tweet/Gabstorms like this one, where he breaks down what "frame" is and how it is the superior tool for persuasion because it manipulates language itself to permit and forbid what is acceptable to think within a population. This is the sort of information you have to go to Mark Passio to get otherwise, and even he doesn't frame it this way- in plain English, for every man to see.

1. I've written about this before, but IT'S IMPORTANT & I want it to stick. MSM journos MUST follow AP standards. Here's the Altright one. pic.twitter.com/DFSWXUPDTr

— Frame Game Radio 🐸 (@FrameGames) September 1, 2017

And then there's his videos, which are just as well-done presentations of the ideas he's getting across. This man knows what media is, how it works, and how each ones differs from the rest. Compare how he uses Gab and Twitter vs. how he uses YouTube and you shall see for yourself.

There are people who pay for university degrees, and graduate degrees, to get half of this taught to them and often without any sense of how or why it works. Before that you had to join secret societies and endure bizarre rituals to learn this stuff. You're now able to learn all of it, for free, and with proper context explaining the hows and whys behind it. Level up your Narrative Warfare game, shitlords. Learn from Frame Game Radio. Gaslighting is a thing; learn how to fight it.