Monday, October 26, 2020

Narrative Warfare: Corruption Ain't Just A Presidential Thing

Following up from yesterday's post, the Excellence of Eloquetion that is Razorfist cut a rant on the Hunter Biden issue and includes ChiCom corruption.

I have got to figure out how to do "Fuck You, I Was Right!" in a wheelchair.

Now this is, so far, focused on said Biden and the dementia patient that is his father. I do want to know how this ties into the political corruption we see being exposed by Project Veritas, since all of the deceit and corruption they exposed and continue to expose materially and directly benefits the Bidens, Pelosis, Obamas, Clintons, et. al. that are at the top grifting like mad and cutting blackmail tapes like it was nothing.

Speaking of Project Veritas, there's a new video.

It is as Anonymous Conservative said. This is a hostile enemy network, it works from the shadows, it has multiple elements comprosing it (and they are rivals; infighting happens), and it cannot succeed if exposed before it seizes control of an area. (Where it does seize control, it often struggles to hold it due to gross incompetence.)

This is how the Thralls work. It's corruption and management of assets all the way down, ensuring that the illusion persists to sucker the rubes while behind the scenes a handful (at most) of people, and very likely only one man, call the shots. The rest of the network's operations are all about extending and maintaining the network's reach and power; that in doing they commit horrific violations of the innocent as sacrifices--"the cost of doing business"--is how the supernatural elements are satisfied.

Yes, this means it is--and always has been--a Satanic cult. They just got savvy about how they did the culty shit.

And it's all coming out right as the God-Emperor smashes it. Empire is falling.

Sunday, October 25, 2020

Narrative Warfare: This Is How They Compromise Targets

Anonymous Conservative had some good insights regarding the revelations gained from Hunter Biden's laptop. How Empire gets its Thralls is going to mirror how the Thralls get thralls of their own. (Edited to break up the original Wall O' Text.)

I have said previously it has appeared one thing Cabal required to advance people to the highest levels was a willingness to prove fealty by giving their children to the machine.

Now, I suspect it was not so much a request they made. Rather, the surveillance was always on the lookout for families like this. Fathers molesting children, sons molesting sisters, drugs, debauchery, and on and on.

Remember it is highly likely almost everyone gets a few days of being followed and them listening in your house every year or two, and some may get much, much more.

I thought they were on the lookout for threats, but now I think they were probably primarily looking for this. When they found a family like this, how high they rose was only a measure of how degenerate they were. The worse their behavior, the more blackmail Cabal would get, and the higher they would rise. Biden is a complete imbecile, but he is just a smidge away from being President, and if Cabal was in full control, he would be.

There's more like this, and you read it on his News Brief for today here.

This is not going to stop. More material will be released, drip-drop, over the last 10 days before the election. I would expect it continue until the Electoral College meets in December, just to be certain. It is after this that we can start the countdown to perpwalks.

Remember the lie at play here: "I see things your way, so let us cooperate so we may both benefit. I will support you, so you can proceed without fear." The lie here is that the support is conditional, and can be withdrawn at anytime, such that lacking the support is sure to result in exposure and destruction.

The revelation here is not just how corruption, in the ordinary sense, operates. It is the confirmation that there is a second cohort, one far more functional than those we see here, that is actually calling the shots and running the operations. This cohort is not confined to a specific race or nation; the Han are not the only spymasters. No doubt that there is a Western cohort--more than one--capable of running operations like this.

And yes, it is as #QAnon said: these people are sick.

Expect more exposure of ChiCom operations to come, thanks in part to Taiwan taking the opportunity to stick it to the Party (GTV is Taiwanese, and they're leaking the tapes), and now that the Daily Mail reported on it the Globohomo blackout has cracked; it will widen and break very soon, after which the Narrative Warfare will become the flood that washes away the filth.

Empire is falling.

Wednesday, October 21, 2020

Narrative Warfare: The US Department of Justice Sues Google

The United States Department of Justice announced an anti-trust lawsuit against Google.

You can thank Project Veritas for the timely release of their expose of Google to make this story carry weight while going viral.

And this is not Trump's October Surprise. That role goes to exposing Joe and Hunter Biden's criminal activities and their threat to national security because it's not just the Bidens, and it not just corruption; it involves human trafficking, pedophilia, and every single other party that benefited from or facilitated the Bidens' criminal activities.

This is the move against Big Tech that everyone on the right has called for all this time. What I would like to remind my fellows is that matters of law, by necessity, are matters of intelligence and as such operational moves follow lengthy and tedious intelligence gathering that goes on for years at a time. These moves have to be done in secret, and thus they cannot appear before the cameras--the same cameras that Big Tech's allies use to gaslight the population as they fight against the God-Emperor--so there will appear to the foolish that nothing is happening.

Now you see that this was not true. The court filings show that DOJ was investigating Google for some time before this, gathering intelligence before deterimining to go operational or not. That decision got made, and here we are.

Don't expect a swift conclusion either. The Microsoft case went on for years, so this will also, but unlike Microsoft this time DOJ can make use of social media to leverage social pressure to compel settlement. This is not the DOJ of the past; don't put it past Barr to wink and nod at that or something like it since Google certainly will do the same.

What you can expect is that the censorship Veritas exposed will ramp up now that it is directly targetted. (This won't help at all.) You can expect mainstream media attacks to ramp up in support. You can also expect more and more craziness from Twitter and Facebook as they too scramble to cover Google. They're all in this together, and if Google falls then all of them follow and they know it. The gaslighting will be thick and obvious, and ultimately prove counter-productive to the gaslighters.

This is not confidence in power. This is desperation over weakness exposed. Empire is falling, and the narratives aren't going to save it.

Sunday, October 18, 2020

Narrative Warfare: Susan Fails The Streisand Effect

You knew it was coming. So did all of the folks mentioned in this article below, so don't be sad that it happened. Look for their backups and rebookmark those.

YouTube has scrubbed many popular “QAnon” and independent news channels from its platform after announcing new rules that prohibit what it deems to be “harmful conspiracy theories.” The channels collectively had millions of subscribers and some of the many channels that were removed during this purge include:

  • X22 Report (952,000 subscribers)
  • SGTreport (630,000 subscribers)
  • Edge of Wonder (467,000 subscribers)
  • Praying Medic (391,000 subscribers)
  • And We Know (385,000 subscribers)
  • Amazing Polly (375,000 subscribers)
  • Joe M (367,000 subscribers)
  • Dollar Vigilante (304,000 subscribers)
  • Mouthy Buddha (296,000 subscribers)
  • JustInformed Talk (281,000 subscribers)
  • RedPill78 (269,000 subscribers)
  • The Patriot Hour (248,000 subscribers)
  • In Pursuit of Truth (242,000 subscribers)
  • Destroying the Illusion (238,000 subscribers)
  • TRUreporting (215,000 subscribers)
  • Alice Down The RabbitHole (174,000 subscribers)
  • Spaceshot76 (159,000 subscribers)
  • World Alternative Media (154,000 subscribers)
  • McAllisterTV (127,000 subscribers)
  • Sarah Westall (125,000 subscribers)
  • Radio-Québec (120,000 subscribers)
  • Truth and Art TV (113,000 subscribers)
  • Dustin Nemos (113,000 subscribers)
  • Blessed To Teach (109,000 subscribers)
  • Woke Societies (108,000 subscribers)
  • Stroppy Me (83,400 subscribers)
  • Patriots’ Soapbox News Network (80,000 subscribers)
  • Angel Wallace (63,000 subscribers)
  • Titus Frost (44,400 subscribers)

YouTube claims that it’s introducing this new policy to remove conspiracy content that’s “used to justify real-world-violence” – a claim that’s similar to those used by several other tech giants when justifying their arbitrary QAnon bans. For example, Facebook framed its QAnon ban as a crackdown on “potential violence.”

Under YouTube’s new policy, content that “targets an individual or group with conspiracy theories that have been used to justify real-world violence” are banned. Of course, YouTube doesn’t explain how it determines when a conspiracy theory is being used to justify real-world violence.

Note that this happened, and yet the pro-pedo channels are still there as are the pro-ISIS and similar violent actors, so again I must tap the sign.

Big Social has designated #QAnon as an Enemy, and this move is meant to cull the enemy from territory Big Social controls because it undermines its allies and their common cause. If that is what you take away from this, then you're already ahead of most normies.

Of course, #QAnon saw this coming. A while back the word started coming out that to maintain operational presence in enemy territory (e.g. YouTube), it will become necessary to go gray (drop the #QAnon tag) and resume disseminating the information under other monikers as part of a more general Truth Movement scene. Do not be the least bit surprised to see a new suite of channels rise up in the vaccum left that does just this: talks about the info without mention Q, showing Q drops, mentioning /8kun/, etc. by citing and linking to cutouts.

As for those nuked, you'll find that many of them have their own sites and more of them are doing as the Supreme Dark Lord Vox Day did and set up their own subscription-based video streaming sites in addition to having backup channels for free viewing at places like Bitchute or LBRY. That's what SGT Report did, and it's why they'll survive--even thrive--despite YouTube doing this; it will drive organic traffic to their sites instead.

Susan seriously underestimated the audience for these channels. They have newsletters. They have sites. They have backups on other social networks. Word spreads on where to go and how to access it fast, and these people--unlike the corporate oligarchs--have a far more human approach to content sharing. She thinks she sunk a threat just as the election was about to climax; all she did was break containment. Nice job breaking it, Villain. This is why Empire is falling.

Friday, October 16, 2020

Narrative Warfare: The Polls Are A Big Ball of Biden Cope

Today's Friday. Time to have a chuckle going into the weekend. First, here's Razorfist reminding you that the polls pushing Biden are bullshit.

The Supreme Dark Lord concurs and expands on this here.

And then there's Stonetoss, who captures in panels what otherwise takes one or more articles to get across.

Context is here, and it just amplifies the burn.

As Wictor says, be happy warriors. The God-Emperor isn't perfect, but he's ours and he deserves--and will--win. They know, so be sure to vote to stick to the folks that hate you, want you dead, want to rape your kids, and think its funny so Trump can finish the job. Empire is falling, and the freakouts on Trump are all the proof you need that he's for us.

Wednesday, October 14, 2020

Narrative Warfare: This Is What Political Media Looks Like

There really isn't much more I need to say to set this up, other than "For those coming in late, pay attention."

And this is why:

  • Swiftly Dated Content: Timely political references age like milk, souring swiftly as the circumstances that the media refers to disappears and with it the power of the punch. Just a few years later, it hits like a wet fart and about 10 years later you have to start explaining it to that were not there at the time, and if you have to explain the joke then you failed. This is why you see all the signs, shirts, buttons, etc. made for campaign season disappear almost immediately after the election is over; the time of relevance expired, and the same is true with politicized media of any other sort like TV shows.
  • Disdain For Plebs: You don't politicized media for any othe reason other than to propagandize and brainwash them, and that means eschewing whatever it is that the media is meant to do- usually entertain, sometimes to instruct (as in a technical manual), and that means expressing contempt and disrespect for the audience that justifies the media's existence. They resent this, so they walk away; "Get Woke, Go Broke" is what results of keeping this up. (As for why this keeps happening, that's for another post.)
  • Demolition Of Goodwill: While those making it may be True Believers, those benefiting from the results tend to be cynical power-seekers scheming to take out competition. One way to do that is to subvert threats and trash their good name by doing things as them--true or not--so the public is demoralized. (This, arguably, is the real objective for all such politicization.) By removing all positive association between that media and the audience, you remove it from their control and put it under yours, enforcing a Monopoly of Organization.

As for how they keep doing it, take a look at how these productions get organized, green-lit, and financed. You'll start finding your answers there.

Monday, October 12, 2020

Sunday, October 11, 2020

Narrative Warfare: Wokal Distance Talks Trump, Post-Modernism, & Narrative Gaslighting

Wokal Distance cut another thread. It starts here.

I'll carry on from there with mild editing.

Each side has a story they want you to believe. So they take the available information, slice it up and edit it into clips, soundbites, and images; then they cherry pick the bits they like and reassemble them in a way that tells the story they want you to hear. Editing allows them to add or remove information, change the context, and decide which facts they want to FOCUS on (IE: using closeups to show one thing while leaving other things out of the frame). This is how the same facts can be used to tell two VERY different stories.

Here are two tweets about Trump preparing to go to the hospital. The first account says Trump might not even be able to walk to the helicopter. The second says Trump is completely fine, and this is just Trump the master showman. Continuing on with our two narratives, here we have two blue checks attacking the credibility of Trumps doctor because he's a DO (osteopathic doctor) and not an MD (allopathic doctor), followed by two doctors claiming DOs (osteopathic doctors) are actually great doctors.

And of course the supporters follow right along in spreading these two utterly different takes on reality. A man on the left claiming Trump is "gasping". A Trump supporter on the right is shocked at how Spry Trump looks and thinks he could do cartwheels. If you want to know how bad it got, there was actually a moment when people were getting their information off of tik tok from Claudia Conway the 15 year old daughter of Trump 2016 campaign manager Kellyanne Conway.

That's what happens when doctors, who should respect the privacy of patients and not do armchair diagnoses, put out absurd hot-takes which get 100K retweets. They light the credibility of the medical establishment on fire in exchange for the warm glow of retweets and likes. So why is this happening? Why are we seeing one set of information give rise to 2 entirely different narratives, narratives which tell utterly different stories? The answer is that this is postmodernism.

Modernist thinking said there objective truth exists, that there are statements which are true regardless of what anyone thinks. Modernism also believes in science, individual rights, democracy, and due process of law. You see, science, democracy, and due process of law all depend on the idea that there is an objective truth that is out there which we can know to be true, and that we can create processes, like science, like the legals system, which can help us get to the truth. But this is Post-Modernism.

Postmodernism denies that there is objective truth. Postmodernism says that the only thing we are able to fully grasp is our own experience. That's it. Postmodern thinking says that since everyone of us has biases so deep that we can never get around them. That means that we can't ever get to the objective truth about reality. We can only see what we are trained to see through the interpretive lens that we get from our culture. It also believes that there is no lens which is better or more true then any other lens.

Postmodernism says the lens that says Trump is healthy is no better or worse than the lens that says he isn't. The lens that says science is the best way to know truth is no better or more true then the lens that says feelings and emotions are the best way to know truth. Postmodernism also says that who decides what is true is about power. The postmodern philosophers say the person who determines what a society thinks is true is a person who gets to have a tremendous amount of power. That is partially true. However, they go further.

They think that because the person who determines what society thinks is true gets power, that anyone who claims that anything is true, is only doing that as a way to try to access the power that comes with deciding what is true. In other words, they think anyone who claims to know the truth is only making that claim so they can get power for themselves. This means they trust nobody, and consistently accuse other people of hiding their true motives. As such they dismiss any claim they don't like as just another lie meant to control people.

The result is exactly what we see in this thread. Everyone thinks that they can use whatever lens they want to interpret whatever facts they want and come to whatever conclusion they want. Whoever says otherwise is accused of having ulterior motives. They act like truth is a matter of opinion, and the goal is to get "your truth" to be declared the official opinion of society.

This is nonsense. Reality is what you run into when your beliefs are wrong, and it does not care about "your truth" or "official opinions." We need to bring back the idea objective truth and start acting like serious people again. If we don't, if we keep going like this, we are going to run into reality very quickly, and it is NOT going to be fun for us.

The answer, of course, is to bring it back to the immediate and viseral. If they claim that reality is subjective, shoot them. Then argue that they didn't get shot because you don't feel like you shot anyone, and your feelings are as valid as their sucking chest wound. Keep that up; don't let them call for help, because they don't need it because they weren't shot and that's valid because you feel it is and that's as valid as their shitting their pants and crying for Mama as they bleed out is.

Not politic, but I've run out of fucks to give and it destroys the premise in a manner both the subject and the observers cannot ignore and will not forget. Substitute with stabbing, beating, throwing off heights, or any other visceral and immediate confrontation with objective truth--the laws of physics in particular--and don't let them get out of it; smear their faces in that bullshit until they--metaphorically or not--choke on it.

Lather, rinse, repeat every time they get back on that bullshit until they stop doing it, they stop being around you, or they stop being.

Here's the real value of knowing about this, and that means I tap the sign yet again.

You can reliably use Post-Modernism as a sign that you face someone that is, at the least, friendly to the enemy and unfriendly to you. They usually are flat-out enemies and when proven so you are free to dispose of them appropriately.


Because this philosophical bullshit is all an elaborate way to redefine gaslighting as morally neutral at worst, and justified in the main. Using classic DARVO Rhetoric, they project upon their targets what they explain as standard operating procedure to enact upon designated targets- both individual and collectives. You can see it when you listen to their rally speeches, you can see it when they confront their enemies on campus and on the campaign trail--Dems do this routinely and have for over 30 years, and so do their European counterparts--and you're now seeing it in corporate training seminars and public school classrooms.

The long-term effect is that a country that relies on a heavy technical infrastructure will see it decay and collapse within 20-30 years, as we've seen in South Africa, because those put in charge of it will be incapable of properly managing it and ensuring that it continues to work as intended. Actual improvement? Not on the table. As the Supreme Dark Lord is want to say, such a country will be lucky to retain indoor plumbing.

That is the consequence of tolerating this heresy--and yes, it is heresy; insert "Burn Heretics" here--instead of suppressing it by all means available (not necessary, available) and putting the leaders down for good (be it prison or the grave; I don't care which).

The objective reality here is that unreality is a fundamental aspect of Empire. It cannot attain power without it. It cannot sustain power without it. It cannot flit from host to host like the parasite it is without it. Those in thrall to it, and becoming its Thralls in turn, are akin to the sorcerors who think they can wield power forbidden to Man and not be yoked by them instead despite all the warnings given because they already gave themselves over to unreality in their hearts, and unreality is Rebellion born of Hubris.

Empire is falling because unreality cannot sustain itself when oppossed by reality. Stand in what is real--in what is Real, in Him--and you cannot lose. You can only die.

Saturday, October 10, 2020

The Monarchist Reading List

This came over my Twitter feed the other day. Looks like I've got plenty of non-fiction to read and digest in the near future.

I have some of this already, such as the complete works of Shakespeare and Machievelli's The Prince, so I'll start there. I welcome others gifting me copies of the rest, preferably in print but electronic will do.

"But what bent you this way?"

Reading John Locke did. No, not just his political philosophy, but the biographies that ground those works into their historical contexts. I did this for my Master's Degree, and I found that he was so insecure due to being a fatherless son in a downwardly-mobile family surrounded by boys of like status but superior means that he turned out Gamma. He was so afraid of failure that he clung to university life well past the "Shit or Get Off The Pot" point, and when he inevitably got the boot he collapsed. If not for meeting Sir Anthony Ainsley, the first Earl Shaftsbury, he wouldv've died a pathetic and wasted end futilly pinching pennies as a petty landlord barely doing better than his tenants.

Instead, he whored himself out to Shaftsbury in return for patronage and provision within the Earl's household. Said Earl was the leader of the Whig Party in Parliament, had so many mercantile interests that flourished due to corrupt dealings, used those revenues to back a party-aligned press (later publishing Locke's works), and turned Locke into being the mouthpiece pushing the philosophical arguments supporting Whig policy and government accordingly.

If this sounds familiar, it should. It's how every single step towards Clown World got made. Culture->Politics in action right here.

And Locke, to this day, remains influential because people don't know how or why he wrote what he wrote.

That's right, doing my Master's is what lead to me becoming disenchanted with the Enlightenment.

And following my long-standing practice, if a path turns bad or dead-ends then the first thing you do is turn around and go back the way you came. You keep going back until you unfuck yourself completely. Then you sever that false path and go another way.

The Enlightenment has proven to be a bad path. It led to Empire, and Empire must fall.

Tuesday, October 6, 2020

Wokal Distance On The Convergence Of American Churches

Taken from today's Twitter thread and quoted below with mild editing.

The Wokeness and postmodernism have come for Christianity. The conservative Southern Baptist Convention passed a resolution allowing the use of Intersectionality and Critical Race Theory as tools for theology. So how did we get here? Two words: Emergent Church

The Emergent Church movement gained popularity in the late 90's early 2000's. They were young, cool, and artsy. But they were also proudly, and openly postmodern. The movement began to go mainstream when this book on Postmodern Ministry by Brian Mclaren came out in 1998.

While Mclaren eventually proved to be the leader of the movement, he wasn't the first to bring postmodernism in to the Church. The first one to do that was very likely John Caputo in 1987. With a book on DECONSTRUCTION in Hermeneutics (fancy term for biblical interpretation).

In "The Prayers and Tears of Jacques Derrida" from 1997, Caputo attempts to bring deconstruction further into Christianity. Those who saw my thread on deconstruction (I'll link below) will recognize the importance deconstruction to postmodernism.

In 1996 Christian Theologian Stanley Grenz saw all this tried sounding the alarm with his book "A Primer on Postmodernism," in which he predicts the coming of postmodernism and says Christians need to be ready for it. (turns out he was right, and 20 years ahead of his time).

Now, because Grenz saw postmodernism coming He worked with John R. Franke to build a framework that would allow Christianity to survive in a postmodern world without being completely deconstructed. Grenz wanted to deconstruct-proof Christianity. Unfortunately it didn't work.

Why did it fail? Because Brian McLaren and John Caputo worked tirelessly to bring postmodernism into Christianity. Remember WWJD? What Would Jesus Do? Here's the postmodern version from a book by Caputo (forward by Mclaren): What Would Jesus DECONSTRUCT? Read the description.

McLaren wrote many books, including "The Secret Message of Jesus," where he deconstructed traditional Christianity while substituting postmodern Christianity in it's place. Here @RaviZacharias exposes McLaren's nonsense as only Ravi could. It's beautiful. I miss you Ravi.

That @RaviZacharias clip from is from 2007 when the deconstruction was the sort that attacks meaning and questions truth. But the Emergent church switched their focus from Meaning to Power. Martin Van Steenwyk explains the shift he helped facilitate in this interview from 2009.

Where deconstruction comes from Jacques Derrida, post-colonial theory gets its main ideas from Michael Foucault. Deconstruction attacks truth by blurring the MEANING of texts and ideas. Post-colonialism attacks truth by saying claims of truth are thinly veiled claims to power.

I'll explain postcolonialism another time, but the 3 main ideas are

  1. people only claim things are true when it suits them
  2. people are so biased no objective assessment of truth is possible
  3. The winners of the "what is true" game are determined by who has the most power

Add post-colonialism to deconstruction and you get a scenario in which anytime anyone says something is true either (a) their claim gets deconstructed or (b) they get accused of trying to make their ideas dominant in society so they can get power. Sound familiar?

In 2011 the first academic book on evangelical Christian postcolonialism came out. It has some familiar names. That's right, both Brian McLaren and John Franke (the man Stanley Grenz thought would help him protect Christianity from postmodernism) went full on postcolonial.

McLaren actually very clearly explains why it is that he blends his deconstructive postmodernism with postcolonial theory. It's because the deconstruction is used to dismantle the ideas of colonialism. Again, does any of this sound familiar?

Also, notice that John Franke writes his postcolonial article with Megan Defranza. well, who is she? She's a former board member for Q-Christian. What's that you ask? it's an organization that fully embraces postmodern gender theory in the name of Jesus. Deconstruction indeed.

Now, You'll remember we began with the Southern Baptist Convention adopting Critical Race Theory and intersectionality. Wouldn't it be nice if we could tie the intersectionality to the postmodernism of the Emergent church? Wouldn't that wrap things up nicely? Well, Kimberlee Crenshaw invented intersectionality in her essay "Mapping the Margins." In that essay she says intersectionality was created to link politics and Postmodern theory. Intersectionality is a Trojan horse for Postmodernism and the Southern Baptist Convention adopted it.

Who else likes intersectionality? The Emergent Church! Rachel Held Evans, who joined the "Emergent Conversation," tried bringing intersectionality into Christianity before her unfortunate passing. Note she mentions Brian McLaren.

So as you can see, the Emergent Church of the late 90's and early 2000's has it's fingerprints all over the Social Justice Christianity that we see today. This is no surprise those are both fruit of the same poisonous tree of postmodernism. What do we do now? Fight.

  1. Get the word out.
  2. Tell you pastors, remind them of the Emergent Church then show how Social Justice Christianity connects to both postmodernism and the Emergent Church
  3. Push back. Don't let them take over.
  4. Be informed and warn the other members of the congregation

This is a fight for the soul of your churches. If you won't take a stand here, where will you draw the line? Time to fight. Let's go!

Let's make this easy. It's HERESY! What do we do with heretics? Do we tolerate them? Do we argue with them? What do we do?

That's right, we ELIMINATE them.

There is no "fighting" to be had, not as Wokal implies. You identify the heresy, call it out, demand compliance, and eliminate everyone that doesn't repent. No need to raise your voice. No need to dispute. You stand in the authority of God and demand obedience to His Word, and you smite every last motherfucker that gainsays you. Yes, even those who dare call themselves "pastor" or "minister" or "priest".

Witch Test them immediately if they dare come at you with invocation of Scripture or similar sophistry. Eliminate those that fail on the spot.

There cannot be peace between the Faithful and the Wicked. Those that push this are wicked, so expose them and cull them without fear for you are doing what not only needs be done, but what is good for your people.

We certainly do not let them come into our lands, enter into our churches, and drive us out of what is rightfully ours. We throw out the invaders and the traiors, those that do not end up fertilizing our crops.

This is harsh, but it is true that Evil fears a militant Good. Godly Men must be Hard Men; every single time things go wrong, it's because men cease being Hard.

The Thralls will not tolerate what they cannot control. Convergence is how they seize control. Heresy is the poison used to sell it in the Church. Burn the heretics.

Sunday, October 4, 2020

Narrative Warfare: On Monopoly Of Organization

Taken from Twitter, today.

There's not much to unpack here if you proper comprehend what "monopoly" and "organization" mean in terms of definition. The Death Cult pursues a policy of covergence because it wants to guarantee that you have no escape from their dogma and the propaganda it uses to gaslight and brainwash you into believing their narrative, embracing their culture, and thus supporting their politics.

When I say "monopoly", I mean it. You have no ability to engage in anything that the Thralls of Empire do not control when they are dominant. They run all workplaces. They run all social organizations. They even run your families, such as they are. Your hobbies--those they allow at all--are theirs to control. Not one book, one film, one game, one thing you can do outside, nothing at all is outside their control.

This why you see SJW bullshit, by whatever brand they're pushing, in every little thing however small or petty it seems. Critical Race Theory, Reparations, Social Justice: all brands pushed by the Thralls of Empire and their Death Cult.

And that is why they freak out whenever they detect any organization they don't control, freak out when it successfully resists its convergence (however partial or short-lived), and freak out when you build alternatives that they can't touch- up to, and including, lethal force (usually by proxy via the state).

Empire must have this, and ruthlessly maintain it, to succeed. It is that fragile.

That is why Empire is falling.

Saturday, October 3, 2020

Wokal Distance Explains Why The Death Cult Converges Orgs

Wokal Distance started another Twitter thread yesterday. Mild editing exercised. Collected below.

The woke are not trying to win the culture war against liberals intellectually, they are trying to win SOCIALLY.

The woke don't fight academically with evidence and reason.

They fight SOCIALLY using power moves to take over institutions and bullying tactics to shut us up.

The woke do not want to merely participate in liberal democratic society; allowing their ideas to be carefully scrutinized by our academic, cultural and democratic institutions.

The woke want to SEIZE POWER in those institutions, and mutate them into institutions of wokeness.

So the tactics adopted by the woke were developed for seizing institutional, cultural, and political power, not for discovering the truth. If it works to send social media mobs after people to get them fired so woke people can take their jobs works, then that is what they do.

Since the goal of the woke is to seize social and political power so they can wield it in the name of their ideology, they are not interested in being kind, civil, or "nice."

In fact Robin DiAngelo actually says "niceness" is bad, and claims it reproduces white supremacy.

The result is that when the woke try to get into positions of power, they do not typically do so by demonstrating they have the MERIT to be in those positions. They are not, to be frank, interested in meeting the standard of merit that liberals use in selecting their leaders.

This is because the woke think liberals and other non-woke groups don't really care about merit, and just use merit as an excuse to keep "marginalized groups" out of positions of power. The woke think leadership requirements are little more than poorly disguised power hoarding.

As such they think meeting liberal standards accepts the logic of liberalism, which they reject and want to replace with wokeness.

So, rather than follow liberal rules of civility, merit, reason, and democracy; they follow woke rules and play cynical social power games.

They will accuse, imply, and insinuate all kinds of things about anyone in order to socially destroy whoever dares to get in their way.

They're not going to tell you you're wrong, they're going to tell everyone else you're a racist, sexist, homophobe.

That's how it works.

Here, Bret Weinstein explains how false accusations of racism were used to try to intimidate him into going along with a woke takeover of College where he was teaching at the time. Please pay close attention.

In this clip Reihan Salam responds to comments by Eddie Glaude and while he is talking Eddie interrupts him to insinuate that Reihan is not being genuiune and is merely trying to score political points in a debate. This is a typical woke tactic.

The point is that if you think you're going to push back on wokeness with arguments according to the rules of civility, fairplay, evidence and reason you are sorely mistaken.

This is not how this works.

The woke don't play that game. Theirs is a contest for power, and they use cynical social tactics in order to try to browbeat people into doing what the woke want them to do. Push back requires we recognize what game the woke are playing, and make that clear to everyone else.

Wokeness has a vulnerability: being understood.

When people understand the game the woke play, they stop going along with it and the woke lose power.

So make their game clear, make it transparent, and call it out. The sooner you do the sooner the woke lose power.

First, let me tap the sign yet again.

Second, another reminder: Wokeness is a Christian heresy, which means I tap the other sign.

You're dealing with a cult, a Satanic cult, one with Will To Power as a central tenet of their ideology. Yes, you can use the Three Laws of SJWs to deal effectively with them (and you should), but there is more that needs be done and knowing how their mindset operates is vital to breaking their playbook. They go straight to Power and don't give a damn about what it takes to get and keep it.

The reason they converge organizations is because they believe in Monopoly of Organization. Not just on Force. They converge every last little group, formal or not, because they are deathly afraid that some enemy will recognize them for what they are and rally opposition to them; this means organizing against them in order to put them down for good, so they are totalitarians of the most ruthless sort.

This is not a rational belief. They cannot be reasoned out of it. They are emotionally committed; they have to be broken at that level or higher.

So make this what it is: a struggle against an evil Satanic cult.

Empire is falling.