Sunday, February 23, 2020

Noticing Corona-Chan's Curious Coincidence.

SGT Report interviewed Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai on the matter of vaccines. He is notable for (a) inventing email and (b) trying to unseat Elizabeth Warren.

This ain't a short video, so I'm going to timestamp where Corona-chan gets into the conversation, but you do want to watch the whole thing.

The conversation turns to Eugenics just after the 30 minute mark. At 33:05, there is a very interesting observation made by Dr. Ayyadurai:

The history of people in power using biological warfare to after an enemy goes back to 600 B.C.. (...) Do the people in power see us as their enemy? What do they see us as?

This observation then goes on to use recent examples of protests against pollution in Wuhan preceding the Corona-chan crisis emerging there, with the effect of shutting down all dissent immediately and giving the government pretext to clear out dissidents under the cover of protecting public health. This is also observed to be intended for Hong Kong once Corona-chan sufficiently afflicts that city and its population.

Curious coincidence, isn't it?

Anonymous Conservative consistently says that the way the world works is not at all the way we're told that it does, and if a critical mass of people knew how things actually worked then there would be a revolution overnight. It is not at all out of line that a government which sees its subjects as the enemy, as an enemy too big to be annihilated, but instead must be managed, would use bioweapons from time to time to cull the herd.

Empire views Mankind as its enemy.

Empire's network of Thralls is global. One set seeing another successfully doing this will prompt swift copycatting, and this has already been noticed on the Chans.

You'll want to open that image in another tab and blow it up. Take heed; shit's going down. Especially you, Vox Day, since you're in Italy.

The way to tell is by the deeds of those with the power to act. It's curious that so many state agencies are not going full turtle over this, but instead are doing things that can't help but to spread the disease. Mister Metokur's been tracking Corona-chan, and he's as cynical about this as he is about most things. Stay alert and get ready folks. Empire's pulling a big move. Empire must fall.

Sunday, February 16, 2020

Noticing The Fixing of the Courts

The Supreme Dark Lord, Vox Day, noticed this article from The Hill. Excerpted below.

Juror 1261, we now know, was Tomeka Hart. Her identity would have remained publicly unknown except for a public statement she made after the Department of Justice (DOJ) rescinded its initial sentencing recommendation for Trump confidant Roger Stone. In the midst of the firestorm of allegations of political interference, Hart disclosed that she was the foreperson on the Stone jury and gave a full-throated defense of the trial prosecutors: “It pains me to see the DOJ now interfere with the hard work of the prosecutors.”

That statement led many people to Google her name, and what they found was a litany of postings not only hostile to President Trump and his administration but also specifically commenting on Stone and his arrest — before she ever appeared for jury duty.... Hart is a Democratic activist and critic of the Trump administration. She was the Memphis City Schools board president. Not surprisingly, given her political background (including a run for Congress), Hart has been vocal in public on her views of Trump and his associates.

She referred to the President with a hashtag of “klanpresident” and spoke out against “Trump and the white supremacist racists.” She posted about how she and others protested outside a Trump hotel and shouted, “Shame, shame, shame!” When profanities were projected on the Trump hotel, she exclaimed on Jan. 13, 2018, “Gotta love it.” On March 24, 2019, she shared a Facebook post — no longer public — while calling attention to “the numerous indictments, guilty pleas, and convictions of people in 45’s inner-circle.”

More worrisome are her direct references to Stone, including a retweeted post, in January 2019, from Bakari Sellers, again raising racist associations and stating that “Roger Stone has y’all talking about reviewing use of force guidelines.” She also described Trump supporters such as Stone as racists and Putin cronies.

In addition to her prior statements about Trump, his associates and this case, Hart is a lawyer. That only magnifies concerns that any bias on her part may have had a more pronounced influence on her fellow jurors.

In fact, except for a jury pool composed entirely of House impeachment managers, Hart would appear to be a standout for a peremptory challenge by the defense team over bias. That is why the most surprising aspect of this story is not the review of her public statements but the review of her examination before trial. The brief examination in the voir dire hearing shows that Hart did disclose her ties to the Democratic Party. U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson asked if Hart’s political history would prevent her from being fair, and Hart assured her it would not.

While Hart’s answers on the jury questionnaire remain sealed, Judge Jackson noted, “You've also indicated a fair amount of paying attention to news and social media, including about political things?” Hart does not volunteer that she did far more than “pay attention to news and social media” and was, in fact, an anti-Trump protester and social media critic.

To which the SDL said this:

The exposure of a jury plant demonstrates the same technique used in the media narrative, in town meetings, in political caucuses, in science propaganda, and every other type of collective activity in which the illusion of a majority consensus is required or deemed desirable.

He is correct. Anonymous Conservative routinely comments on exactly this. Below is just from today's post.

Michael Bloomberg’s Achilles heel is going to be not women or racism or gun control, but his business ties to China. What you begin to grasp when you play this game is that Cabal does not just make billionaires here and there, while others blissfully amass their fortunes honestly. Cabal is weak, because it is operating against the entire legal system, and the vast, vast majority of the people. It needs to hide, and indeed, work hard to never leave any tangible evidence of its existence. It is not in a strong position, even as it dominates, because its only strength is an easily attacked secrecy, and its control over the outlets in this country which could quickly reveal its secrets. But there are other outlets elsewhere, and evidence of its existence, and criminality, is everywhere. So Cabal is vulnerable, and money is power. Every billionaire is an immense threat, should they decide to blow the whistle. For that reason, Cabal does not just make billionaires, but it also actively works to destroy and suppress those individuals with billionaire-potential that it does not control. So Bloomberg, supported by Cabal, with dealings in China, probably will look very close to the what the Bidens look like if people take a close look at the origins of his money. He is likely a Cabal-creation.

(Emphasis is mine.)

This is it, right here. Empire, as I call it, is based on a lie. That lie cannot stand up to the truth, so the delusion bubble must be defended and expanded at all costs; this inevitably would take the form we recognize as an intelligence operation, but it is really a cult, and it gaslights its members as ruthlessly as it does the wider public that it is far more powerful than it actually is: the Gamma Male operating on the scope and scale of cosmic phenomenon.

And as with the title character in The Wizard of Oz, Empire doesn't want you to pay attention to the man behind the curtain. That's what's going on here; this was meant to go unnoticed, and therefore without blowback. Thanks to this woman's need to brag, and Mike Cernovich digging into it when he saw it, this is now getting mainstream press attention. The follow-up play, as Judge Napolitano said, is to declare a mistrial and do this again- preferably in a clean venue where Empire isn't running the courtroom or the jury box.

This is difficult, due to Empire successfully suborning American institutions for as long as the Long March has gone on, if not longer. We'll see if a Denied Area can be set up so Stone can get his new trial and with it the acquittal or minor fine (no jail time), but one thing is certain: the spat between Barr and Trump over the tweets are theater, meant to sucker the media--and it did--into pushing the "Barr is independent of Trump" narrative. He's not. That bit of theater is a distraction to cover the ongoing investigations and sealed indictments being piled up while the Senate cleans out the Federal Judiciary with Trump-loyal judges. Once a critical mass of the latter hits, then you can expect those indictments to be unsealed and prosecuted.

And those prosecutions? They'll go down in a Denied Area, ensuring that fuckery like what happened to Roger Stone is impossible. The mill grinds slow, but fine. Empire must fall.

Sunday, February 9, 2020

They're Telling You How To Defeat Them

Friend of the blog Beige Shiba posted an insightful Twitter thread last night. It starts here.

The rest of the thread is as follows:

They start with a similar premise - there is the reasonable person, and the unreasonable person (both as the author of the comic defines such) and they end in very differing ways.

In a left leaning strawman comic, the unreasonable person demonstrates their unreasonableness and the reasonable person retaliates in a cathartic outburst of violence, the most raw and naked expression of power, with the implication they will be free of consequences for doing so.

In a right leaning strawman comic, the unreasonable person demonstrates their unreasonableness and the reasonable person demonstrates they are in possession of the truth, which the unreasonable person then rejects and immediately suffers self destructive karmic justice for.

People on the right often complain and mock the left wing strawman comics for not being funny, failing to understand the difference in worldview, particularly how the left and the right perceive justice to work.

The left, being mostly doctrinaire materialists, consider justice to be a thing which must be administered by temporal power. They consider someone suffering consequences for mocking of temporal power, which they regard as sacred if their guys are holding it, to be amusing.

The right, conversely, regard justice as fundamentally being something that is ultimately in the hands of some spiritual force, typically a deity. They consider someone suffering consequences for mocking of transcendent and sacred spiritual forces, to be amusing.

This is what adherence to The Myth of the Absent Throne looks like in practice. Shiba's explanation of the Left's perspective shows what happens when you believe the throne is absent and therefore Everything Goes. In their projection they also reveal what they believe an occupied throne would look like: a brutal, petty and bloodthirsty despot and tyrant ready and willing to slaughter without hesitation at the slightest provocation.

What does this tell you? They hate and fear their Father.

It also explains why they react so strongly against displays of confident manhood; it's a reflection of the Father, whom they fear and hate. Yes, this includes the God-Emperor. Yes, this includes Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson. Yes, this includes even events that otherwise were failures or mixed bags at best such as the tiki march at Charlottesville.


Look at what sets them off: a man, firm in his frame, standing tall and telling them "No." It reminds them of their fathers enforcing boundaries of behavior, and often then enforcing them with significant--even severe--punishment. A man, again firm in his frame, laughing at them and mocking them dismissively reminds them of every time their fathers put down their pretensions and put them back into line. Women clearly and obviously wanting to be around such men, to be part of their lives as wives and mothers to their children.

This hatred of a life spent on something other than themselves is abhorrent to them. They show this by their behavior. They fear that if they ever lose power to a true and proper patriarch, then they will all be seized and subjugated into submission- not death, submission; they reveal this in how they wield power when they've got it. They would rather die than give in, as they see submission as the supreme humiliation ritual meant to break them and render them suitable for the yoke.

Friends, they are telling you how to beat them. Take the hint, and tune your rhetoric accordingly. Empire must fall, and that starts with its Thralls.