On Anarchy, Borders, & Empire

Let me lay out some stuff for you.

More than anything else, I oppose those who will not leave me alone. There is no one having any business with me that I did not initiate, so I resent all intrusions upon my turf no matter the excuse. I mind my own business, and I expect everyone else to do the same. I prefer to go about my business quietly and peacefully, and I expect everyone else to do the same. The way I live reliably creates, as an emergent property, the very law and order that makes Civilization possible.

Yes, this does mean I am an anarchist at my roots, because I understand that "No Ruler" does NOT mean "No Rules". However, I also recognize that to live in this manner requires that everyone else adhere to the same culture that I do, and therefore possess the same comprehension of Nature and Natural Law that I do. I recognize that this does not exist without the creation and vigorous, ruthless defense of firm and permanent borders.

Put short, I know that the anarchy I desire can only exist within a specific nation whose culture allows for it and therefore only within a country wholly inhabited by that nation, and permitting only those aliens and foreigners who can be counted upon to abide by our culture to come within our country and spend time here- and even then, they only ever be allowed to visit.

Now, let's look at Empire. Regardless of its manifestation--Rome, Britain, China, Sumeria--one of the repeating traits of Empire is a total disregard for borders. All within the Empire is allowed, even compelled, to associate with one another; borders mean nothing because they can be violated at will if the state permits it, and association itself can be compelled at the point of a sword (or, these days, a gun). Why do this? To feed Empire's childish wants according to its childish whims. Yes, it's a "Feed me, Seymour!" situation; the state needs the peons to produce so it can consume and live lavishly (as it feels entitled to) at their expense- the state is a crime syndicate writ large.

Degrading the cultures of subject peoples into mirroring Empire's childish state is no accident; "Divide & Conquer" works when Empire can wield a childish people against whatever it deems objectionable enough to destroy. That this is often justified in some form of engineering or utopian language reveals a fundamental tell of Empire: it cannot accept life as it is, but instead it insists that it must be as it whims- and then goes on to throw tantrums until it collapses under its own failures to adapt to what actually is.

For all that Civilization is said to be about imposing one's will on Nature, what is actually true is that what Civilization actually is involves accepting Nature and Nature's Law as it is and (to borrow gamer parlance) to Git Gud at working with it. Mastery of the natural world does not mean making it the slave of the mature man. It means nothing more, and nothing less, than coming to know what it is, trusting that it will always be what it is, and then working with it to create the better tomorrow that said man imagines.

In the actual, working anarchies this IS how things work: you work with others, accepting them as they are, trusting that they will be what they are, and collaborating to achieve what one imagines. That is Civilization. That is Order. That is Law. Men sperging, be it at the mouth or at the pen, is not Law; true law needs no men to enforce it. And to get this, one must have and maintain borders so that those incompatible with this culture cannot disrupt it from within or destroy it from without.

And that, folks, is why I am a Nationalist. Globalism is Empire, and Empire is Treason. Empire will never leave me alone, so I oppose it. I align with the West, because the West is Civilization. (And the sooner we can restore our borders and remove the aliens and traitors serving Empire, the better.)

The Corbett Report: Yes, Mainstream Media Bias is Getting Ridiculous...But Why?

SHOW NOTES AND COMMENTS: HERE

Have you noticed how over-the-top ridiculous the mainstream propaganda is getting during this (s)election cycle? Of course you have. And so have most of your mainstream-believing friends and co-workers. So why is the MSM pushing this in the public's face? Is there an agenda at play here?

Fucking Duh.

It's this simple: the establishment media has finally hit the point where Internet-based alternatives, exploited by people who know them and know people, can play these fuckers like fiddles. One man, one fucking man--Mike Cernovich--has done this. He is single-handedly driving the news cycle, doing on his own things that even Alex Jones has failed to do for years, and if not for Paul Jospeh Watson the Infowars crew would also be behind the curve. WeAreChange didn't get on board until well after Cernovich made Trump into what that campaign is now. The alt-media isn't that much better than the MSM, which should not surprise me given their focus and mindset.

The clickbait sites are going down, now that Gawker's shown them to be vulnerable. The MSM keeps getting played like fiddles and milked like LOLcows. The excitement for Trump is YUGE, and all the whining about him being part of the control mechanism conveniently leaves out things that otherwise sensible folks forget: that Empire runs on people, and people (however organized) can only do so much in a given interval of time.

In short, Empire Is Not Invincible. It has to maintain itself, just like any other system must, or entropy will consume it. Empire cannot contravene Natural Law. That's why it has to consume and consume and consume; it is so abhorrent to Natural Law that it must fuel its existence in the manner of a vampire or it WILL DIE.

So, what happens when someone starts fucking with Empire by using its psychology against it? Now you have the answer. This is it. Empire Must Fall.

The Corbett Report's 9/11 Special Series: 9/11 Suspects & Misdirection Therefrom

The Corbett Report got going because of 9/11. Of course James Corbett would get together some form of a video special to mark the 15th anniversary of that day in 2001. So, here it is, six videos on some of the most ill-reported or regarded folks that had clear connections to the event and benefited from it. These suspects' influence does matter here and now, not just those seeking higher office (elected or appointed), but also in what else they can do to aide the globalist cause of Empire.

On that list is Bob Baer, the man whom Syriana is based. He was the lead on a History Channel miniseries titled "Hunting Hitler", also featuring former U.S. Marshall Lenny DePaul among the team of experts brought in to execute the show's search.

There's a reason I'm pointing this out, and that reason is the CIA's long-standing connection to the entertainment industry- and make no mistake, the History Channel is an entertainment industry outlet. Using entertainment media to enact Narrative control is a long-standing thing that the CIA does, and this does include provision of material and personnel; as with the U.S. military's relationship, this too is intended to (a) make the Agency look good and (b) control any dangerous narratives that may come out.

One very effective method is known as the "Limited Hangout". The idea is simple: use the truth to further a lie. In this context, knowing that Baer's "former" (no such thing) CIA and has an existing relationship of his own to the entertainment industry in addition to what the CIA has, it puts to mind the idea that "Hunting Hitler" (itself building on a MysteryQuest episode from 2009, wherein the Soviet "proof" of Hitler's death is exposed as a fraud) is a Limited Hangout. In other words, what we're shown is true- but why we're shown that is to mask more current, and therefore relevant, shenanigans by channel any energy building towards those things being exposed to something now harmless to reveal for what it was.

Let me put on my Historian hat here.

Like it or not, the immediate utility to digging up the full and complete truth about World War 2 is slim to none now. If you're someone that is into truth or justice, knowing that the historical narrative surrounding Adolph Hitler's death is a pile of bullshit doesn't help much in dealing with things that are going on here and now, even if you can (and you can) connect then and now. World War 2 is Ancient History to damn near everyone alive, and therefore considered irrelevant now. Yet not too long ago that same period had more reverence; things you can say and do now with that period was taboo just 30 years ago- much like how Vietnam now is still a bit touchy in the U.S. due to that generation's memory of it being alive and well. That, folks, is when something shifts from "recent history" to "history": when the generation that lived it dies off.

So, what would a Boomer like Baer be willing to conceal about the last 30-40 years such that exposing the truth about Hitler would be considered worthwhile to do as a way of drawing off popular attention? In the late 1990s, Baer would be in the prime of his career and rising to senior status; he'd be in a position to have some knowledge about things leading up to 9/11 even if he had no direct participation in it. He would also be highly likely to know about other dirty deeds done on behalf of Empire, some he directly participated in doing, and therefore had corpses (literal and otherwise) he wanted kept buried. Burning obsolete narratives to protect a current and relevant one? Not even a choice. Of course that's what a spook would do; it's classic misdirection, and it's classic because it reliably works.

That, folks, is a big reason for why the real history of the world tends to come out only after the generation that made it happen is dead: all of those with skin in that game cashed out, so it doesn't matter anymore. (Sometimes it comes out even later, when the children or grand-children that directly benefit from those events die off.) What you need to ask when you see things like "Hunting Hitler" is "What more recent concern benefits from distracting attention from it to this?" Empire rules, in part, by keeping you hard at hunting snipes and chasing ghosts.

(Red Ice & Radio 3Fourteen) Four Episodes on the Threats the West Faces

First, the videos. Then my comments. Additional links can be found in the YouTube video descriptions; click through to get to that page and get to them.

StateOfNation is a 24-year-old British man living in Italy who produces the YouTube channel of the same name. Among his noteworthy videos are “Nationalism in 90 Seconds” and “The Demographic Decline of Britain.”

Aynaz “Anni” Cyrus is a 32-year-old Iranian-born woman who rejected Islam and fled Iran to America in her teens. She came to the United States after years of persecution, torture, and imprisonment. Now she works to protect and defend the rights of women and girls under the oppression of Sharia Law and fights to raise awareness through informative videos, radio interviews, blog posts and on her “Live Up To Freedom” website.

She'll tell her story of life in an Islamic gulag and we detail what life is like for women under Sharia Law. We also discuss what the Quran really says about women and the claim that Islam is a religion of peace. Later, Annie shares her view on western feminists and liberals who are welcoming Islam and so called refugees into western nations. She'll also tell why she supports Trump.

Bill Warner holds a PhD in physics and math, NC State University, 1968. He has been a university professor, businessman, and applied physicist. Dr. Warner founded the Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI) and is its director. He has produced a dozen books, including a Koran, a biography of Mohammed and a summary of the political traditions of Mohammed. He also developed the first self-study course on Political Islam. He has given talks nationally and internationally about Islamic political doctrine.

We begin by diving headfirst into the history of Islam. Bill differentiates between the historical Muhammad and the Muhammad of the Quran. Unbeknownst to many, Muhammad spent much of his life as a politician and jihadist, and was involved in many assassinations. Bill reminds us that jihad is not only of the sword, but also of of the tongue and pen – meaning that Islam’s war against the West is being waged on the cultural/political level as well. We also detail the process by which Islam subjugates non-Muslims after they have been conquered.

In the members’ hour, we discuss Islam’s historical intolerance of other religions and cultures. Bill reminds us that much of the Middle East and North Africa were Christian prior to the spread of Islam, and that the crusades were in reality a reaction to this encroachment. We also touch upon the myth of the Islamic “Golden Age.” We then shift the conversation toward more contemporary issues, such as the current threat Islam poses to the West and how political correctness prevents people from discussing this pressing issue. In conclusion, Bill argues that people need to simply tell the truth about Islam and stop worrying about being called “racists” or “Islamophobes.”

Judgy Bitch (also known as Janet Bloomfield) has an undergraduate degree in Film Theory, a Master’s degree in Business Administration and she has recently been admitted to a PhD program in Entrepreneurship and Innovation, but she is not sure she wants to go just yet. She is a full time mother to her three children and a full time wife to her husband. Her children have never seen the inside of a daycare center and her husband has never made his own sandwich, and that makes her very happy.

A filmed version of this interview is available for Red Ice members.

We begin by discussing how Janet came to realize the insidious nature of feminism, to which she was first exposed while studying Film Theory. Having grown up on a farm with multiple brothers, Janet found herself unable to accept the notion that women are oppressed. However, her disdain for feminism didn’t fully sink in until she had a son; it was only then that she began truly questioning the experience of men in contemporary society. We also discuss how unfairly the institution of patriarchy has been maligned, despite the fact women are safest when in monogamous, heterosexual relationships. We wrap up the first hour by considering how we can heal the schism that feminism has sown between the sexes.

In the members’ hour, we switch gears to delve a number into broader cultural and political issues. We discuss the alt-right, including Hillary’s amusing speech. Janet expresses that she doesn’t think the alt-right is necessarily “racist” or “anti-Semitic”, and that most of the antics within the alt-right that could be described as such amount to nothing more than trolling. We talk about Trump, with Janet observing that people are tired of getting duped by mainstream politicians and are thus thrilled to finally have a third option. We also consider White Genocide and the urgent need for European nations to stick together. Our conversation concludes with some musings on the necessity of competition, on both an individual and also a group level.

Okay, folks, have a seat.

Let's start with this: Globalism is Empire. Empire has to leap from host to host to survive. It currently believes the West to be exhausted, so it's looking to leap to a stronger host. The influx of Muslim men of fighting age into Europe, North America, and the rest of the West is a move to make that leap under deniable cover. The rise in criminal violence and predation upon the nations of the West is deliberate treason by Globalist elites. They knew what was going to happen, they want it to happen, and they don't give a damn about the rest of us- they want their orc mercenaries to do their genocide for them.

Which means that Globalism is inherently predatory, vampire-style, and knows no limits to either appetite or behavior. While this does lead to self-destruction sooner or later, that's no comfort to those preyed upon and consumed until then. The State is your enemy. It will side with those seeking to kill you, rape your children, and steal your wealth. You are on your own. As the State has betrayed you, you have no obligation to it or to its rules; The Rule of Law is NOT a suicide pact!

Some of you are finding this out the hard way, as you're seeing just how much effort you have to put into using legal measures to get anything useful done about this- when they work at all. Meanwhile, those same orcs continue to do their thing and they're inciting others of like spirit to act up and make things even worse for the nations of the West. All the while, the media establishment continues to lie bald-faced to you about what's going on.

There is a point where you have to step away from the library, suspend your meetings in the salon, and go to the armory to get your guns and ammo. We're there now. The nations of the West need to take the matter into their own hands, starting with yanking the incompetent and criminal state agents (including heads of state) from office by any means necessary. Once control over the government is restored, then take the holding action done by the nation at-large to keep the orcs in check and move it to wholesale purge. Death or deportation, it matters not so long as none--not a single one--of these aliens and foreigners (or the traitors who side with them) are left and instead are gone for good.

Nationalism is the Solution to Empire.