Good Men Don't Harm Innocent Dogs

Champaign Communist Hasan Piker got outed for animal abuse this past week. It's going as you expect.

I want you to realize that it took Hasan being caught live on stream abusing his dog to get a non-trivial number of people to go after him.

What does this tell you? You have to use Rhetoric, not Dialectic, to persuade the masses. Today that means using the most massive displays of Rhetoric to move that needle due to how things are across the Western World.

But everyone worth a damn loves dogs and does not want them abused, to the point where there's a website all about if a dog in a movie dies or not. This is our shorthand for Good Or Bad Person, and we've built an entire film franchise around it.

Friends, take heart that enough of the people at-large are still possessed of sufficient moral sense to know that you do not harm innocent animals to get outraged when that happens in real life- not just on a movie screen.

Take heart that this incident was enough to scare that wretched cockroach into immediate Cover Your Ass behavior with gaslighting so obvious that Stevie Wonder could see it, and that those too rotted by the heresy of Communism to have it afflict their Friend/Enemy Distinction outed themselves by going along with it.

"Hasan Abuses His Dog" is a Rhetorical Killshot. It's true, it hits on a Third Rail of Western culture, and he knows how bad it looks by his reaction to this- so hammer him on it until he cracks, as well as his supporters, especially the bosses at Twitch and Amazon. Good Men Don't Harm Innocent Dogs.