We Blew Up Their Death Star

The game changed this past year.

No one amongst the Thralls of Empire took seriously the possibility that their globalization plans could be slowed, nevermind stopped, so no one in the political, academic, and especially the media Establishments throughout the globalized world took Brexit seriously. They figured that this referendum would come, result in Remain winning, and that's that. (And if not, they figured on forcing revotes until it did.) Well, Brexit did win and the revotes aren't coming- and no, I don't expect the judicial route to nullifying the referendum to work either, as a long-asleep British people are finally realizing that it's on them--and no one else--to ensure that the vote's results become final and past-tense-binding.

As we now know, SJWs Always Lie!. Following that, we also now know SJWs Always Double-Down., and double-down they did when they could not ignore the viability of Donald Trump as a candidate for the Presidency of the United States. One need not look too hard to find all sorts of Internet image memes mocking the willful blindness of the #NeverTrump crowd, the Democrat Party, and especially the Social Justice death cult as they insisted with the delusional zealotry of a heroin addict deep into withdrawl that Crooked Sick Pedo Hillary Clinton would inevitably win the election.

The game that changed was the game of illusionism known as "public relations". In short, someone finally read Saul Alinsky's Rules For Radicals and began using it against Saul's own side. That's not all, however, as we also saw that the lessons of #Gamergate got applied to this election campaign in a most spectacular fashion. Memetic narrative warfare, done with laughter and joy at the lulz to be had, at all levels of U.S. society--including by people in the Trump campaign--complete countered the most powerful institutions of narrative warfare yet devised at their own game.

I cannot understate how big of an upset these two political campaigns are to the global Establishment. The political realignment in London and Washington D.C. is not a minor shuffling of deck chairs; this is a serious political power shift that hasn't happened in over a generation on either side of the Atlantic. The technocrats in Brussels are shitting themselves now, and they're panicking. So yeah, we blew up their Death Star.

You had better believe that more violent options to put down the threat of France, Italy, or any other EU member state breaking free are now on the table. (The "jackals", as John Perkins put it in Confessions of an Economic Hit-Man, are not just for 3rd World operations.) It's just a matter of figuring out if the Thralls have a Thrawn or a dumbass at the helm. Right now I'm thinking it's a dumbass.

And if you're expecting me to start working towards a reference to The Empire Strikes Back, you're not wrong, but we're not there yet. Wait for it.

The game is the management of perception, and starting with #Gamergate that sensibility (and the acumen to make it work) broke containment and got out into the population at-large. Multiple places across the Internet now openly talk about narrative warfare, memetic warfare, the importance of popular support, and 4th Generation Warfare. More books on this are getting out there. More podcasts are getting out there. More people are on speaking tours talking about, and demonstrating by deed, this sort of thing- and the reactions have been either pathetic counter-memetics or far more effective use of violence.

What we did last year was a great thing, and it broken open a window of opportunity by ruthless exploitation of a weakness heretofore unseen by many and ill-believed by many more. Empire is unbeatable, until it isn't- and we found out last year that it's not. "Beatable", however, does not mean "inevitable defeat"; they can turn this around, and violence is likely the way it'll be attempted.

By that, I mean the push-pull scheme of using the migrant invasion to set up the perception of "unacceptable" criminality against certain parts of the population by the invaders and contrast that to the "unacceptable" violence against those same invaders by unwanted parts of the population- a problem that "of course" can only be solved by the imposition of a violent police state with total surveillance at all times backed by a standing occupation force of "police officers".

Why? To get sufficient political cover to do this:

Best Darth Vader Scene EVER by debunkerbuster
If they had Darth Vader, this wouldn't be a metaphor.

So no, we're not out of the woods yet. Not we in the trenches. Not the God-Emperor Ascendant. None of us. Look for tells out of what others (rightly) call "The Deep State", and be ready for Round 2. They're going to ratchet up the pressure, so we've got to adapt and Git Gud; we've got an advantage is that they really haven't updated their playbook in decades, so a lot of the leaks and exposes of old still have value, but they've got institutional power on their side and plenty of normies still aren't aware of what's really going on- and worse, a significant number of them are Morpheus said to Neo in The Matrix:

The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you're inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it.

So, how about it? Ready for the next level? I am. Natural Law is on our side- the Force is with us. Empire must fall.

Administration: We're Picking Up The Pace

It's time for a change here.

It's a simple and easy one to say, but it's a far bigger one to comprehend. In short, I'm ceasing the practice of only posting here on Sundays. I'm now going to post here whenever I find it relevant and useful to do so, and man has it become necessary to do this. The pace increased, and I've got to pick it up just to not get run over.

So expect more than one post in a week going forward. Further, expect more serial posting, where I spread an exploration or an argument across multiple posts. As such, I'm going to reduce such posts on my main blog accordingly and redirect that attention here.

Yeah, not much to say in this post, but that's fine. I can run my mouth at length later. Sometimes, brevity is appropriate.

"Fake News" Ain't New. It's Just More Language Destruction.

This "Fake news" thing ain't new, folks. It's a big iteration of what happened a generation or two before you were born, when the last big one hit (while Operation Mockingbird was still officially a thing), so it's time for a bit of a history lesson and how yesteryear made today's cultural context.

“Conspiracy theory” is a term that at once strikes fear and anxiety in the hearts of most every public figure, particularly journalists and academics. Since the 1960s the label has become a disciplinary device that has been overwhelmingly effective in defining certain events off limits to inquiry or debate. Especially in the United States raising legitimate questions about dubious official narratives destined to inform public opinion (and thereby public policy) is a major thought crime that must be cauterized from the public psyche at all costs.

CIA Conspiracy Theory’s acutely negative connotations may be traced to liberal historian Richard Hofstadter’s well-known fusillades against the “New Right.” Yet it was the Central Intelligence Agency that likely played the greatest role in effectively “weaponizing” the term. In the groundswell of public skepticism toward the Warren Commission’s findings on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, the CIA sent a detailed directive to all of its bureaus. Titled “Countering Criticism of the Warren Commission Report,” the dispatch played a definitive role in making the “conspiracy theory” term a weapon to be wielded against almost any individual or group calling the government’s increasingly clandestine programs and activities into question.

This important memorandum and its broad implications for American politics and public discourse are detailed in a book by Florida State University political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith, Conspiracy Theory in America. Dr. deHaven-Smith devised the state crimes against democracy concept to interpret and explain potential government complicity in events such as the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the major political assassinations of the 1960s, and 9/11.

CIA Document 1035-960 was released in response to a 1976 FOIA request by the New York Times. The directive is especially significant because it outlines the CIA’s concern regarding “the whole reputation of the American government” vis-à-vis the Warren Commission Report. The agency was especially interested in maintaining its own image and role as it “contributed information to the [Warren] investigation.”

The memorandum lays out a detailed series of actions and techniques for “countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries.” For example, approaching “friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors)” to remind them of the Warren Commission’s integrity and soundness should be prioritized. “[T]he charges of the critics are without serious foundation,” the document reads, and “further speculative discussion only plays in to the hands of the [Communist] opposition.”

The agency also directed its members “[t]o employ propaganda assets to [negate] and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose.”

1035-960 further delineates specific techniques for countering “conspiratorial” arguments centering on the Warren Commission’s findings. Such responses and their coupling with the pejorative label have been routinely wheeled out in various guises by corporate media outlets, commentators and political leaders to this day against those demanding truth and accountability about momentous public events.

(Note: Additional links and info here, in the Description.)

"If you want to enslave a nation, first take away their language." is NOT limited to the plot of Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain, 1984, or Brave New World. It is part-and-parcel with all forms of "scientific dictatorship", wherein would-be technocrats train the population as if they were dogs to behavior as they desire by shaping the size of practical vocabularies and the meanings of words through their control over the media- direct, by ownership, and indirect through cultural institutions (such as schools). Empire, as a meme, has to resort to language corruption and destruction to ensure its domination and thus its survival by inducing dependency upon the host nation its parasitizes. It's not as hard as it seems; it just takes generational increments of time to accomplish and maintenance thereafter.

pic.twitter.com/dxTINdFSjY

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) January 2, 2017

Do Not Feed Your Enemies

Stop giving to people who hate you. Your time, your money, your attention, your energy, your posterity, your property- all of it. Just stop. You know good goddamn well that all that will do is feed the beast baying for your blood.

I don't need to expound on this. It's not hard to comprehend; folks who shit on you are not for you, so stop supporting them and start supporting those people who are for you. From the Big Picture down to the everyday, this is how you start and sustain resistance to those who seek to prey upon and destroy you: stop giving to them.

That's it. Done. No need for a treatise. Go forth, and feed your enemies no more.

Natural Law Made So Simple a Retarded Rhesus Monkey Could Grok It

I haven't given any attention to Mark Passio or Max Egan lately, so I'm embedding below two recent podcasts of Max's. Mark was a guest on one, and the other is this weekend's show. However, to grasp what Mark's saying you need to hear the solo show first so that's the order I'm going to embed them. The rest of this post will assume that you've listened to both podcasts. Also, because Long Post Is Long, a mercy cut; what I have to say will be behind that cut..

Scrubbing, Blackouts, & Threats: #PizzaGate Is Real

The reaction to #PizzaGate is a big ol' tell that this shit is legit. You do NOT have a concerted media hit, followed by a blackout, over nothing. You do NOT have a global pattern of such behavior throughout the media over nothing. You do not have a swift and sudden tsunami of Hits upon YouTube accounts covering the matter over nothing. Not even the most dedicated trolls out there do this sort of thing, for there are no lulz to be had by doing so.

#Pizzagate @RealityCallsV @BrittPettibone @FranSeenWrites @mflynnJR pic.twitter.com/6c6IUdvd9r

— KTM (@OrganicJustice) December 11, 2016

Oh no. There is something to it, and since Officialdom is (again) protecting the suspects instead of investigating and prosecuting them (we don't even have someone thrown to the wolves yet) it's up to the people to do it themselves. /pol/ at the various chans are on the case, doing the digging, from which others (such as YouTube user Reality Calls, or Jan Irvin at Gnostic Media) further analyze and popularize through their outlets until it filters down to Normieville.

The thing that folks who dig into this sort of thing learn, if they stay sane, that Normies don't is this: the people involved in something as serious as thing do not want to be exposed. Therefore they can, and do, employ all means available to quash exposure threats. That's how this massive institutional response becomes the tell that #PizzaGate is real: you don't do this unless you're spooked, and hauling ass to put down a threat.

This follows the pattern laid out in Confessions of an Economic Hitman: Media manipulation, then cooptation (which is what those "hitmen" do), followed by discrete killing ("jackals", real hitmen), and concluding with open use of state power (the military and security services)- with the worst threats murdered while "resisting arrest" and then coming back to media manipulation to gaslight and gatekeep the narrative back into line.

Yeah, that shit's scary as fuck, which is why anonymity is vital to successful investigation of this mater- and why moves to censor and lock down the Internet is rightly seen as being part of the scheme to protect the interests served by this global pedophila network and cult. (Yes, "interests served", because this cult/ring is just a tool used to achieve desired ends- it itself just as expendable as the ammunition used to end their predatory lives.

This must go on, and the full length and depth of the ring exposed, because our future and our posterity relies on it. Time to bring the bloodsuckers into the glory of the sun and watch them squirm and burn within it.

Razorfist: Abolition is Retardation: The Electoral College Rant

I see no reason to bother with a lengthy--or even brief--post on the defense of the Electoral College when Razorfist does it for me. So I'll just embed his video (a brief one) and let him do the talking. (Side of Fuck You to the Climate Hoax for additional goodiness.)

The two key points of the rant: The College keeps the rural population from being silenced, and the Hoaxing Media lies shamelessly (and has for generations) in order to keep the population suckered into voting for centralization (which urbanization is part of). Not only should the Collage be protected, decentralization--of power, of population, etc.--so that the other trends undermining the Republic get retarded or shut down needs to be done.

This is not an American issue. Every country has this urban/rural split, and this split is contributing to the political and economic problems because centralization is about control first and foremost- and control of others is a tell for Empire. The very idea that we would ever let a few population centers dominate the politics of a sovereign country means only that we never escaped the city-state era, and that the elites of the city still--after millenia--fail to see that the country does not need the city, and thus wonders when the countryside cuts them off what happened (or gets indignant and attempts to enslave them).

The College isn't a perfect counterbalance, but a mechanic need not be perfect to be effective. The U.S. would've had far more political violence than we've seen so far otherwise, and even then we did have one civil war and several regional issues over the years, but to abolish a tool that works? Madness at best, and treason at worst; either way, not to be tolerated.